<p>I took it in Fall 2012. </p>
<p>I’m sorry to be downer, but you are more than likely going to hate that class. Since it’s a general requirement, I know a lot of people who have taken it or are currently enrolled, and all but 1 hate the course. Here’s my experience with HUM 2305:</p>
<p>It was created by a professor named Andrew Wolpert. My friend had him and still hated the course. I had Ferdinand Lewis & Donna Cohen as professors. Lewis was somewhat better than Cohen at the beginning, but his message became completely distorted by the end of the semester. Cohen always tried connecting things to architecture, and none of her connections ever made sense. I only attended lectures because there was an attendance policy (3 absences allowed before grade penalty) at the time, which has since been repealed. I never paid attention in class, but luckily, I didn’t have to. Since I was in one of the 2 largest HUM 2305 sections, I could buy Smokin’ Notes for the exams. During class, I just goofed off on my laptop and conversed in hushed tones with friends. Also, the performances and lecture we had to attend were confusing and boring, but the Harn Museum exhibit was kinda interesting.
The only thing that made the class bearable was my TA, Kiren Valjee. His take on the class material was somewhat interesting, and he was pretty generous when it came to grades. He never gave any quizzes, so everyone got full credit in that category, and I barely spoke in class and still got full credit for participation. Since he also graded essays and exams (which were also essays), I finished the course with a pretty easy A (99.1%). At the end of the semester, he told us the changes that were to be implemented for the following semesters and he asked us what we truly thought about the class. Obviously, all of my classmates and I were grateful for the opportunity to vent. Seriously, why was I, a pre-medical biology major, being required to take what seemed like a nonsensical pseudo-philosophy class created by a classics professor (the guy specialized in teaching about ancient Greece) and taught by 2 professors from the colleges of Design/Planning/Construction & Architecture? </p>
<p>There will be some difference between my experience and yours. You won’t have attendance, but you will have oral presentations and less performances to attend. However, don’t be surprised if you get a professor who’s field is completely unrelated to the class (which is supposed to be about defining and attaining happiness…I think). If you can get Kiren as your TA, you should definitely do so. He’s a nice guy who’s generous with grades and much more interesting to listen to than the professors. He’s probably more qualified to the teach than them, since at least he’s an English Ph.D student, and so much of the course is literary interpretation. </p>
<p>Now you know what you’re up against. On the bright side, you do get 3 humanities credits. The course used to give 2k words for Gordon Rule as well, but that was removed before Summer B 2012. </p>
<p>Prepare for the worst; hope for the best. Brace yourself, good luck, and no, I’m not being overdramatic because the course did actually suck that much.</p>