<p>I am usually extremely friendly with my professional contacts. I’m only testy with guys that shows off with “stanford phd -> Mckinsey”.</p>
<p>Sorry for Mckinsey SVO, what a hiring mistake. “Future” associate practicing hard at the art of arrogance and bridge burning even before he lay down the first line in a deck. As if he is the only one that has ever gotten that job.</p>
<p>@Blah</p>
<p>have you worked at full day at Mck yet? Or this consulting thing is just a theory to you?</p>
<p>SLO doesn’t have a hiring problem. So you need not worry.</p>
<p>As usual, you come off as presumptuous with a tinge of insecurity (ok, fine, maybe more than a tinge). Rest assured however, I’m actually working in the real world now and have been doing so for a while. Keep on pretending that you think I’m an pre-associate, however. It would be inline with your errant (at best) assertions.</p>
<p>Obvious it’s my opinion, which is why the statement is qualified by ‘I think.’ Additionally, my statement isn’t ‘purely anecdotal,’ I defended it immediately after i made it, in a part you either didn’t read, or deliberately ignored.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>One of those links is just its accomplishments page, which most universities have, and the other ranking based on payscale is skewed just because it’s a school with a lot of engineers. Neither are that impressive, imo.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Please explain your basis for this statement and if it is your personal opinion and purely anecdotal, then please state it as such.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Perhaps he’d be better prepared for McKinsey if he had ‘learned by doing’ at SLO :rolleyes:</p>