<p>Taehonchoi, that your son really wants to go there, is a driving reason, and I can understand that. I have my son at an OOS public school and am paying that premium right now. Monetarily, not worth it and I know it. I’m doing it because that is the school he chose, and we had allowed him to make that choice as long as the cost was under a certain amount. That he could find options even less than that amount was not something we went into. So, he picked and we pay.</p>
<p>As for judging schools by test score ranges, that isn’t always the way it works around here. There are certain schools in this country that do have a lot of lustre, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, MIT. No one will argue about that. But when you are talking about schools that are not those on the top of the name recognition scale, no one really cares and hardly knows whether UCSD has a higher or lower test score range than Cal Poly. And they do not care. That’s the case with most of the colleges. I know some relative differentials but for many schools, I have no idea and I track things like this more than most people. Many of us on this board are interested in this sort of thing so we do track it. But it’s not what most people do. They have no idea.Perhaps right in the California area there are pecking orders by UCs, and Cal States, but other than the biggies, Berkeley and LA, most of the country doesn’t really know one from the other. </p>
<p>When you harp on things like this, it leaves a bad taste in a lot of people’s mouths. It’s literally considered in bad taste. There are schools that have lower ranges that are actually considered better school by ratings, reputaiton and recognition. Because that isn’t the only thing that makes a school “better”.</p>
<p>Also, the test score range, and even other indexes such as starting pay, pay scales after say 10 years, does not determine that a “better” school by those standards is better for a given individual. Studies have shown time and again that those who are accepted by a very top school and then decide to go elsewhere tend to do just as well as the peers at that top school. I’ve seen that many times myself, and there are times that the less competitive atmosphere, being big fish in small pond may be beneficial to some people. </p>
<p>Also in terms of standard of living, you’ll find that the Seattle area is much less expensive than CA, in general. My brother lives in a small ranch that costs as much as my big house in an area that is considered high COA. JUst not as high as California. Those are considerations about moving.</p>