<p>+$150k starting salary
+$2,000,000 ending salary
+Awesome work environment
+Room for advancement
+Competitive benefits
+Quatitatively and Qualitatively unmatched and envied by your inferiors
+You get to wear a suit</p>
<p>-100 hour work weeks
-You need superb quantitative and qualitative skills and a can-do attitude, or you will fail.</p>
<p>Corporate "Law"</p>
<p>+You get to wear a suit
+You get to work on 52nd Street
+Requires no quantitative skills
+Cool image because of Ally Mcbeal</p>
<p>-100 hour work weeks
-$60k starting salary
-Most CL's don't last more than a couple years.
-You have to go to law school
-You have to go to a really good law school and graduate in the top 1% or you won't get hired
-Your bosses are insecure and arrogant and yell at you for no reason</p>
<p>Everything depends on everything.....you can never be sure about anything...what do you like more, interacting with people and reading/writing a lot, or doing math and punching millions of numbers into excel...that's what it comes down to...</p>
<p>Okay.....one's definitely better than the other. It's relative, how could you even have an argument on what's a better career? What do you think is better and vice-versa?</p>
<p>He thinks CL is a better career because he lacks the quantitative skills and can-do attitude for IB. I prefer IB because Wall Street > 42nd street and Law school < me.</p>
<p>You consider law school to be beneath you. Sue me.</p>
<p>You want a ****ing match? Pick another opponent, because I'm not playing. I have betting things to do, like actually make progress towards going to law school. Have fun feuding with yourself, Luminaire.</p>