<p>
[quote]
Actually, Penn did release the data for the individual schools. The acceptance rate data can be found here: CAS acceptance rate - step right up!
You'll see that the CAS rate is actually slightly lower than the overall reported rate, due to engineering's very high acceptance rate. Wharton's only acts to balance it out, since it is roughly the same size as engineering.
Furthermore, the deans revealed in 2004 that the difference in Wharton and CAS SAT averages were only 14 points. Source? this book: Amazon.com: The Running of the Bulls: Inside the Cutthroat Race from Wharton to Wall Street: Nicole Ridgway: Books
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I'm so glad that you were able to do all of the great detective work, muerte, piecing together pieces of random data from different years and different sources. If Penn didn't have something to hide, why wouldn't they release their data a la Cornell?</p>
<p>Cornell</a> Factbook - Undergraduate Enrollment
Cornell</a> Factbook - Undergraduate Admissions</p>
<p>But at the end of the day, you can't prove to anyone that Penn's SAS is systematically better than Cornell's CAS. The admissions rate, while largely meaningless, is virtually the same -- 16% and 18%, respectively, and that's not even considering that Penn takes a lot more students ED, which helps to mechanically lower their overall rate.</p>
<p>And on the SAT score front, all we know is that both Penn SAS and Cornell CAS have an average SAT score of between 1410-1430. And frankly, that's not much to write home about, as there will be a lot more variation between any two students in one of these schools than there will be between the average student across the two schools.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Finally, you should note that 99% of Penn freshman come from the top 10% of their HS classes (compared to Cornell's 88%).
[/quote]
</p>
<p>You do realize that less than half of students are now reporting class rank, right? So the data is largely meaningless. Even if there weren't structural problems with the way the data is being reported and the Cornell CAS number is in the mid 90s.</p>
<p>
[quote]
So here it is: the big guns. Or just gun, really. Hopefully it will blow away your ignorance: The Center for Measuring University Performance ranks Penn in its top cluster of research universities in the nation, tied with Columbia, Harvard, MIT and Stanford.
Feel free to check this out here: <a href="http://mup.asu.edu/research2006.pdf%5B/url%5D%5B/quote%5D">http://mup.asu.edu/research2006.pdf
[/quote]
</a></p>
<p>Sigh. We've been through this before, muerte. Nobody in higher ed respects that study, as it lacks any sort of empirical basis to determine the <em>quality</em> of a university or its research programs. The NRC rankings are much better regarded:</p>
<p>NRC</a> Rankings</p>
<p>Under which Cornell ranks 4th for all scores and 9th for all nonzero scores, whereas it ranks Penn 9th and 14th, respectively. </p>
<p>But we can argue numbers and split hairs all day and get nowhere.</p>
<p>The funny thing is that you completely choose to disregard any plausible reasons for why a student might actually want to attend Cornell over Penn. In you mind, it just shouldn't happen, which is dangerously naive and misguided. Cornell offers courses in Old Norse -- Penn doesn't. Cornell offers fantastic research opportunities in experimental physics to undergraduates, while Penn's a bit lacking in this regard. How you can't see compelling reasons to attend Cornell is beyond me. </p>
<p>But we've been through this all before and yet you persist with your stubborn and uninformed views. Can't we just agree that both Cornell and Penn are two fantastic undergraduate institutions that any student would be happy to attend? That Penn offers a compelling urban experience, while Cornell offers an enticing rural and natural setting. Penn has a decent basketball culture. Cornell has an unrivaled hockey culture. And that Cornell has stronger offerings in the physical sciences, Penn has stronger offerings in the social sciences, and that they are both equally strong in the humanities.</p>
<p>Any other stance is just moronic. And your attitude doesn't exactly encourage baby-making.</p>