<p>I should stop making promises.</p>
<p>
[quote]
dude, no. that chess essay was dank.
[/quote]
[quote]
You're chess essay is very innovative. You should send it to Cornell as a supplemental essay.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>OMFG. We're evaluating this essay using completely different criteria here. Fine, it's entertaining, it's creative, it's innovative, it's unique. SO WHAT?</p>
<p>Sure, an application essay needs to be interesting, but if admissions officers analyzed app essays purely based on their entertainment value, then everyone would be submitting short, humorous, fiction stories.</p>
<p>What does an admissions officer gain from reading this essay except that he's a creative writer, he sucks at chess, and his brain has tunnel vision? Are you people in elementary school or something? You don't even understand the point of writing an admissions essay?!?!?! Yeah, it's a great essay, FOR HIS BOOK OR FOR A CREATIVE WRITING CONTEST!!!!!! Not for a college application!!!!! Easier colleges might allow it, but not the Ivy League. </p>
<p>
[quote]
My queen was alive; there was no way they would ever take her. But in my obsession with her safety, my king was not.</p>
<p>Perhaps overanalyzing a situation isn’t as helpful as you’d think.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>JACKPOT! Did you actually imagine this stuff when you were playing the chess game?? NO! Pieces attack queen, queen runs. What the **** did you analyze. If anything, it shows that you did not analyze enough. </p>
<p>If you had been planning a humongous offensive on the kingside, starting with a bishop sacrifice, seeing 8 moves in advance, going to through dozens of variations in your head, and not seeing that you were about to be checkmated, THAT is analyzing too much. </p>
<p>However, that is not what happened. You didn’t have a plan. You saw zero moves in advance. You went through zero variations. You didn’t know what the **** you were doing!!!! There was absolutely no analysis involved there.</p>