<p>^With a voracious reader who engages in class discussion/critical thinking well, but doesn’t write effectively, I’d first suggest watching him on the technical side of computer use and word processing. He should be able to type very fast, ideally using his entire hand (not hunt/peck), be swift with his ability to sweep text and move around paragraphs. He needs to be able to type almost as fast as he speaks, then not hesitate to try out his paragraphs with new locations of words/phrases simply due to anticipated slowness or clumsiness on copy/paste moves. Computer programs or classes to increase his keyboarding speed and word processing skills, perhaps over the summer, might play a role. </p>
<p>In Middle School, one of my kids could talk like a logical whirlwind with great word choice, but when it came time to put words to paper, he was, um, boring. We had no writing tutors in our remote rural town. For many evenings, I sat with him and gave him writing prompts. He spoke his answer in a few interesting sentences, and I’d say, “Stop! Write that down.” I had to listen very carefully because he’d muddle a phrase or forget a key word that made it all so interesting when he spoke. Because I had listened, I could and did supply it back to him from my memory. At first I was his scribe, but eventually he scribed his own spoken words. I say “scribe” but we were typing at a screen at the time. We did that over and over with different prompts, a wide variety of stimuli. </p>
<p>I was trying to teach him to listen to the words inside his head. No pre-editing or hesitation. Once seen on paper, they could be edited a bit, or not. After several sessions, which were actually fun for us, something “clicked” for him. A few months later, his writing more resembled his academic conversational ability. It was “in synch” as your son’s l0th grade teacher hopes for your bright son. This is a very dynamic tutoring, possible 1:1. It isn’t what a fine English teacher can do, because s/he’s presented with a complete draft essay, then tries to correct or improve that product. A tutor (or you, if you have the courage) can interact more by chunking his speaking and writing into much smaller bits. </p>
<p>All that was based on when I taught First and Second Grade. I’d often tell my students, “Write it so it sounds like talking.” Or, “say it…good! now write that.” In a few cases, I’d tell them to pretend they were talking on a cellphone to their Auntie (complete with the hand-to-ear) far away, who wasn’t there when it happened. They should tell the story so she could understand it. (That was to get a clear narrative.) They wrote that part down. Then I’d pretend to be the Auntie, read their sentences, “dial” back and ask them for more details and interesting features to get them to embellish their story beyond the straight narrative. I guess I was using dialogue and interactive conversation to inform their writing style. Nobody taught me this, I just made it up. I suppose it exists in pedagogical textbooks but, after a while, I became too busy teaching to read textbooks Perhaps some of these ideas translate for your older kids? </p>
<p>Sometimes they need to loosen up becayse there’s something in their brain processing that is bumping into a fence somewhere between their head and their fingertips. Especially with voracious readers (like my own kids and yours), they need to develop their own voice inside their own head, HEAR it, and have no technical impediments to putting it onto paper for their own review. </p>
<p>Good writers tap into their own “writer’s voice” as it’s called. My homemade methods were attempts to
elicit that from my own nurtured children, as well as my less fortunate students in a rural poverty school.</p>
<p>Being a great reader is extremely helpful to writing, so you are wise to consider your son’s reading habits an asset. I once heard a radio interview with the President of Bard College, where the teaching of writing is a prized strength. He said the writing faculty agreed to eliminate much of the “peer review” time in college classrooms for their creative writing courses. They believe the way to write very well is to READ great writers, break apart why those pieces work. Then they have a model. They felt that students bringing in student-level work, with other students tearing it apart to “improve,” kept everyone at a low level. The students were good at peer review, but the faculty felt this was not optimal use of college classroom time. After their changeover, half of the assignments for Bard Writing courses were devoted to reading and discussing examples of great writing. </p>
<p>I thought often about this interview. I know that, after we moved to this nice suburb, my next younger son’s quality public H.S. school English teachers were all about writing/correcting/re-writing their students’ compositions. It’s not enough. Students needed to read outside of school assignments to search out a wide variety of fine writers for models. The high school English classes themselves assigned a few novels per semester to discuss endlessly, chapter by chapter. Too few authors, too few exposures to styles. An independent reading habit was essential, even with a fine high school. </p>
<p>Your son may be able to identify things in the great works he reads, tear them apart and tell you why they work as writing. Short stories might be easier to manage for this than whole novels. Break apart the model. Talk about it as you drive. Don’t call it tutoring. </p>
<p>I hope you find some of these tips helpful. Best wishes.</p>