<p>have you ever visited any of the UK schools? If not, here is what i know about them</p>
<p>Durham is like Oxford in that it is made up with small colleges and it's old, seriously old. One of the colleges, university college (known as "castle" in the town) is actually a 900 year old castle. Dungeons and battlements, the works (I just googled it for a picture <a href="http://ditraglia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/durham_castle.jpg%5B/url%5D">http://ditraglia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/durham_castle.jpg</a> ). Whereas some of the colleges, just like Oxbridge ones, are 1960s built and modern. Durham is a much smaller place than Oxford. It can't have a population of more than about 20,000 I reckon. Perched on a hill and cold. I really like the city, it's beautiful. But if you are a big city person and like noise, crowds and clubbing, Durham is probably not for you. Having said that, Newcastle, party city of the north, is only 20 mins away. It's not as remote as St Andrews I don't think. London is more than 2 hours away by train. If money is a concern, life in Durham is probably as cheap as you can get in the UK. I don't know about tuition fees though.</p>
<p>Warwick is completely the opposite of Durham. It is a modern self-contained campus, isolated in a field pretty far from the actual city of Warwick (as opposed to Durham and Oxbridge colleges which are dispersed throughout their respective cities and don't really have a campus as such. it is more like the universities happen to have little towns growing up around them). After the first year, when on campus accommodation is guarenteed, most students live in nearby Coventry or Leamington Spa. Warwick is a stellar reputation in the UK but I doubt anyone putside the UK has head of it. Remember that apart from Oxbridge, UK schools have rolling admission. I applied on 15th october and had an acceptance letter from Warwick before the start of November (but I didn't go there).</p>
<p>LSE, being in the centre of London, is obviously going to be very different from your other choices. It has the reputation of being the most international university in the UK. I think I have read that 50% of students are from overseas (but don't quote me on that. I may be wrong). Living costs in London are going to be astronomical. LSE has a big reputation outside of the UK so it has the best "name" of your list, apart from Oxford. This may or may not be important to your career. Also being located right there in "the city" is a good place to be when it comes to internships and stuff.</p>
<p>The only place where St Andrews has an amazing reputation is the US. No-one had heard of it before Prince William went there. They have a very good marketing team. I do not think it is as good as your other choices, but i do not know about your subject specifically. In Scotland the course will be 4 years as opposed to 3 years in England, but you will get an MA rather than a BA at the end. if you can pay you will certainly get in. They've got to pay the bills. Make no mistake this is why they are recruiting Americans. $$$. It's a good school, but not amazing. Remember William was not all that smart. he got ABC in his A-level grades. </p>
<p>I think you'll be in at St Andrews, and probably at Warwick and Durham if you apply early (which you will to meet the Oxford deadline). They are not super selective and you're paying. LSE you have a decent chance. Oxford is very hard to say since I don't know much about your subject, and it's a bit random. Generally very few candidates who apply straight from a US high school get in. Most have completed a year of a US college already.</p>
<p>I think probably they won't look at your SAT IIs, but put them on the application form just in case! It can't hurt.</p>
<p>Everywhere is going to be dark in the winter. It's called latitude. St Andrews being the worst on your list for that since it's the furthest north. On the flip side, in the summer 9when you won't be here of course, having gone home for the holidays) it is light till 10pm, maybe 11 in Scotland.</p>