investment banking & GPA

<p>is it really that hard to get just a summer analyst position at firms like credit suisse? even for students who they don't visit there school?</p>

<p>Yes it is that hard, you have no idea how hard it is until you go through the process. I thought it would be easy to get 1st round interviews all the banks. I mean I go to Harvard with a 3.8ish. I think I m at a 30% conversion rate with BB IBs. Specifically with CS my roommate got rejected who has a 3.97ish. Honestly Good Luck but since you go to an unknown school for IB I don’t see even an interview happening.</p>

<p>To illumin4tus….you hit the job market FT in what?? 2010? No worries about bonuses it will be a completely new bull market by then 2010.</p>

<p>I really appreciate your honest insight. I was wondering if you or anyway one else has any advice on other banks, that are not on par with CS, who I might have a shot at with at obtaining an summer analyst position. I'm a senior so do you know of any banks that also offer and encourage summer analyst or internship positions to graduates who are looking to gain expirience? I was wondering too, how important are connections with these banks?...I have a friend who I'm going to contact that worked for CS for a few years and he says he still knows alot of people there. I was hoping he could point me in the right direction so atleast my resume could get reviewed by them, because they don't actively recruit at my school.</p>

<p>Wachovia .</p>

<p>Bump. I got plenty of interviews with a 3.5. Offers in IBD.</p>

<p>you have to be pretty exceptional to get multiple bb offers with a 3.5. i'd assume that most of your offers were from small boutiques, unless you had previous work experience or connections</p>

<p>this year was brutal, with few people with <3.7 getting interviews if they did not have previous finance experience. generally people >3.7 got interviews, though perhaps its because of the market</p>

<p>i got ZERO IB interviews with a 3.5 in ECE/Econ from a target. I applied to all of the top 10 firms. It's competitive as all hell.</p>

<p>Yea these kids have no idea what they are talking about /in for....GPA is number one...no exceptions!!! the only thing that is weighted heavier than GPA is really really good work experience ( as in previous IB/S&T internships or working buyside at a prop/HF /PE firm......</p>

<p>The same kids hog all the offers.....ask any of your upperclass men buddies interviewing this semester...</p>

<p>Is McGill a target?</p>

<p>I got like 5 interviews (couple BBs, and lazard, houlihan, moelis and co) non-target, sophomore.</p>

<p>by calling/cold emailing?</p>

<p>gpa isnt nearly as important as you guys seem to think it is. Once you are above a certain threshold (3.4-3.6), that box gets checked off and they look at other stuff. i did final rounds with a bunch of firms, and not one person cared about what my gpa was. banking doesn't demand much intellectually; its waaaayyyy more important to not be a tool and be able to connect with your interviewers than it is to have a 3.9.</p>

<p>how do YOU connect with your interviewer?</p>

<p>One banker I met said that he happened to like the same baseball team (I think it was Boston). That was enough to make a connection and move forward.</p>

<p>i like to know how one gets an interview at moelis from outside there recruited schools</p>

<p>by simply applying on campus. well, semi-target i guess.</p>

<p>what school</p>

<p>I had very strong academic credentials (think, 3.7+) at a target. while I got interviews at some of the top IBs, I didn't get interviews at some of them either. The interesting part is that I got more interviews at the very top consulting companies (think 5 top on vault). It's extremely competitive. I think GPA is very critical.</p>

<p>And at one of the receptions by one of the top IBs (think top 5 on vault), they said that it is very critical for someone to demonstrate strong communication and interpersonal skills. The meaning: you need to have good social skills and they need to be apparent during the interview. I know a lot of very intelligent kids that got interviews at the top banks but didn't get many offers.</p>

<p>Basically I go to a mid-level business school in their MSF program. I should graduate in a year with about a 3.8-3.9. My B School isn't recruited by any of the major players, but the mid guys do recruit here. I work full time also so that is why it is taking me a bit longer. I've already passed the 7 and I should have passed the second level of the CFA exam by the Summer of 2009. That is when I want to get in. Anyways I currently work at a medium-large size financial firm doing performance research. It really has nothing to do with IB though, it is more of an IT/Accounting position. It is slightly better than a basic ops position, and it is on the lower end of the research spectrum. So the experience isn't great by any means. </p>

<p>Would I be better sticking with my current job until Summer of 2009, and just rely on my 2 and a half years experience from that position or should I try to get a buy-side internship this coming summer? The problem with that is I'd obviously lose my current job, make less money (not that I make much now), and be out of a job in fall. Or should I just roll with my 2 and a half years of work experience in my current position, MSF degree and Level II CFA when I want to get hired Summer/Fall 09? </p>

<p>Also I'm not a total nerd by any stretch. I had a much lower GPA during undergrad, partied way too much, and enjoyed the Greek life way too much. </p>

<p>Either way what are my chances of getting a good associate position in Summer 2009 with those credentials? Do I have any chance with the bulge and if so how would I go about it considering they don't recruit my school?</p>

<p>Oh and I can't get in with my current firm's IB division for a couple reasons. They have some weird rules about transferring departments plus I wouldn't be able to get in even as an analyst until I'm done with graduate school. They have this thing about working and going to school at the same time. So essentially I'd have to wait until 2009 anyways with my current firm. Plus since I'd essentially be transferring I'm sure I'd get lowballed even if I got to come in as an associate.</p>