<p>Hi all, I'm a high school senior hoping to major in Economics that was recently accepted into Swarthmore's Class of 2017. I attended DiscoSwat this year in the fall, and just came back from RTT two days ago.</p>
<p>My question is exactly how I laid it out in the title. When I received my financial aid package two weeks ago in the mail, I was somewhat disappointed and confused to find that Swarthmore had offered me $25,000 in grants a year (which is an astounding number), and expected my family to contribute the estimated $35,000 difference to pay to attend Swarthmore in the fall. In practicality, my family can only afford to pay about $20,000 of the $35,000, and if we chose Swarthmore over our alternative (University of Kansas), we would most likely have to take out $15,000 in loans a year, racking up $60,000 in student loans by the time I graduate.</p>
<p>I'm in the process of reapplying for financial reconsideration in an effort to see if there was an error in the financial aid decision, but there's very little time left before the May 1 deadline, and I'd like to hear more opinions on our dilemma.</p>
<p>For comparison, the University of Kansas has admitted me into their Honors College, offered me less in scholarships (albeit the cost of 4 years of KU tuition would barely scratch the cost of one year at Swarthmore), and has already directed me to their Associate Dean of Admissions and Scholarships, who is a Professor Slughorn type-of-guy, if you know the reference. This Associate Dean has already aided my sister (college junior) and her boyfriend in recently applying, and winning, Goldwater Scholarships, and was ecstatic to hear from my sister that I might be attending in the fall.</p>
<p>tl;dr: (title)? I have a solid, cheaper, alternative in the University of Kansas. Does the name value, professional value, and academic value of a Swarthmore degree prospectively outweigh the burden of $60,000 in loans upon graduation?</p>