<p>@papapia, It seemed to me that comparison fit the best, as he is comparing the price of organically grown food to conventionally grown food. Indeed would mean “without question,” which makes the sentence sound very odd</p>
<p>edit: don’t give me that kind of sass on a Sunday!</p>
<p>^ I understand you might be excellent. But why would cornet and I (credible people hopefully) both say it if it weren’t true. This reminds me of the whole emphatic/balanced controversy.</p>
<p>you and cornet are saying two different things:</p>
<p>cornet is saying that he put retiring and penchant as his choice. However you are saying that you don’t remember aversion being paired with diffident even though YOU put diffident one as the answer</p>
<p>retiring and penchant made the most sense because the author did not care about his personal affairs but he did have a penchant, an inclination to, to the public affiars and controversy.</p>
<p>Hmm, I think I was so caught up on self-effacing and diffident being synonyms, that I completely didn’t care about aversion; that’s probably why I don’t remember it. And also, I wasn’t aware retiring also meant diffident. So I guess retiring/penchant is right then, -1, damn.</p>
<p>lol for the emphatic question, i read it as empathetic, so i picked some weird answer… (not balanced though, i knew that was wrong). I think that was the only one i got wrong, so hopefully 800.</p>
<p>Some guy asked about “indeed” and “by comparison” on a writing section. It was “indeed” i believe.</p>
<p>Oh actually before i act confident of 800, let me confirm a few questions. For mother-daughter education in america question, the answer was conviction? And for Kael passage the anecdote served as introduction?</p>