Is it a bigger achievement to be accepted into Columbia as undergrad or as grad?

[objobs]

<p>

@suzaliscious

@objobs: I don’t need to read your mind, objobs.

</p>

<p>@suzaliscious: Why the redundancy? suzaliscious.</p>

<p>

@suzaliscious

You respond to the mildest barb against your institution and jump in with guns blazing, gung ho about defending it from the cruel posters of this forum. Yet the post which you identify as the originator of the Stanford vs. Columbia argument does not even take away from the qualities of Stanford in any shape or form - it merely makes a passing note on how a certain part of the population might view the relative prestige of these two institutions.

</p>

<p>That wasn’t the post to which I was responding. You asked: “how did the question of Stanford even come up?” So I gave you the answer.</p>

<p>

@suzaliscious

Should I type that again, or in a simpler form, seeing as your skills of comprehension seem to leave a lot to be desired?

</p>

<p>Like I said, I only have Stanford-quality SAT scores. So please try to use as many mono-syllabic words as possible. Thanks.</p>

<p>

@suzaliscious

Or could you understand what the poster meant perfectly well but felt that even the mere supposition that Stanford might not be <em>gasp</em> the penultimate institute of higher learning that exists is such blasphemy that you must quell such notions immediately?

</p>

<p>So many big words, so many syllables. What to do?</p>

<p>

@suzaliscious

After behaving such I can’t believe you have the temerity to call other posters insecure. You can add hypocrisy to the already towering (I imagine) list of your shortcomings.

</p>

<p>Hypocrisy > Self-Righteousness. That said, I never confirmed or denied my security (or lack thereof). So your claims of “hypocrisy” are unfounded.</p>

<p>

@suzaliscious

How did Stanford even admit a student as narrow-minded, intolerant, insecure and inconsiderate as you anyways?

</p>

<p>Stanford likes diversity, I guess.</p>