Good thread question! Just a note on the quote above…Harvard has not announced that any of spring semester will be remote. Spring classes have always been planned to start on January 24; Harvard basically went remote for the winter break (they announced this at the end of finals so it didn’t affect the fall semester, and the remote period goes only through January 21). This does not affect the typical undergrad students; only people who are working on campus during winter break. Of course, they may end up extending this in the coming weeks, but as of right now, they have not said they are altering the spring semester, so the undergrads are expected to have 2 intact in-person semesters this year.
I do have a child there, who would be a senior. Here’s a clearer background on what the kids there are experiencing: Freshman year was normal, sophomore year was normal until mid-March, then junior year was online classes, and senior year back to completely in-person with vibrant social lives, activities, dining halls, sports, parties, research, full dorms, etc. More than 1/3 of the current senior class took 1 or 2 semesters off last year, so will not have the full possible 2.5 remote semesters, but rather .5 or 1.5, depending on how long they “gapped”. Kids I know who did stay enrolled in classes last year tended to make the best of it; these are resourceful people! Some took advantage of the situation to go with a group of classmates to live in great locations–kind of once in a lifetime experience! Seems the majority returned to Cambridge and rented housing with big groups of friends, so they still had a large critical mass of classmates to spend time with in the Cambridge/Boston area. I think it’s safe to say they’d all have preferred in-person classes last year, but they still got to spend time with amazing peers they met through school. Additionally, Harvard did announce they were going remote early and invested in making the remote experience as great as possible (my child was not thrilled with the results, however ). So they still had well-facilitated live on-line classes with their professors and talented peers (each course was required to maintain live, interactive classes; they could not just be videos for students to watch alone, etc). I am also grateful that they had the resources to provide frequent, easy testing to the kids so that barely any of them contracted covid and they were able to relax and enjoy themselves when they were in large groups, knowing that all the people around them were recently tested (something some public schools were also able to pull off).
So, do I think it’s been worth it? Well, I certainly wish the pandemic hadn’t happened during their college time. But all the things he was hoping to get at his school vs. other choices of schools have continued to pan out. In his case, he had 1 and a half semesters with remote classes, out of 8 semesters. He hated online class, but would have hated online anywhere, and perhaps even more at schools that didn’t invest as heavily on training and technology to optimize online classes. But even during those 1.5 semesters, he was glad he was doing it with the people at his school. There isn’t even a tiny part of him or us who wished he was at a different school as this school is a fantastic fit for him. But we are praying that Omicron comes and goes quickly, for everyone’s sake!!
Now if you were making up a hypothetical and the option was 8 remote semesters at Harvard vs. 8 in-person semesters at a public school (I like public universities to begin with), that’s a no-brainer–4 in-person years, please!!
(Note: suffice it to say that my child and we do not AT ALL agree with MWolf that Harvard is only selling the degree and that there is nothing else uniquely valuable about the school and its people, but I am not going to list the reasons (that go far beyond a piece of paper) why the school was chosen. Also silly for MWolf to suggest that there should be “a mass exodus of Harvard students” to colleges which are in-person or hybrid, when Harvard itself has been in-person all year. One last note on MWolf’s comments, I have a (used) Jeep! It never occurred to me that it is a status symbol, and that is not why I bought it. It is SO FUN to drive, I am crazy about its aesthetics, I actually feel like it is the opposite of a status symbol and kind of a very casual and low-key and unfancy car for a middle-aged person, and I love that it is an American car. Haven’t had a lick of trouble with it, and we are over 100,000 miles. It is coming across very presumptuous that you assert you know why people buy things and your assumption is that it’s for status. I think you are off-base on this one.