<p>Hey all. Like many people here I'm a perfectionist. When I was studying for the ACT I was confident that a 34 would be the lowest I would get. All of my practice tests yielded scores between 35 and 36. It turns out, however, that when I was doing my practices I wasn't timing myself (it completely slipped my mind) so when it got to be test day I lost track of time and ended up guessing a fair few problems on the science and math because I simply ran out of time. As a result my composite score ended up being 29, a score about which I am extremely disappointed.</p>
<p>My question to all of the folks here is: Is retaking the test even worth it? This score really is disappointing to me and I know I could have done better had I been paying attention to the time because I knew how to do each problem I skipped. The thing is, I don't know if it's necessary. All of the universities to which I am applying de-emphasize SAT/ACT scores and a 29, while not satisfactory, is still well within the acceptable limits of my selected universities. </p>
<p>So is re-taking the test in my situation even worth it if the universities to which I am applying care less than I do? Should I spend the extra time, money, and effort when my score is decent when compared to most (most in general, not most of the people on College Confidential of course) and the rest of my academic record is great? I'm looking for honest opinions, it's fine to be rough. Thanks for any advice.</p>