<p>So I recently found out that I was a Semi-Finalist for Missouri. I was excited, but unsure of what I was winning. On further research, I found out that the National Merit Scholarship was a "tremendous opportunity" I shouldn't waste. However: I am not convinced. Hear me out.</p>
<p>Neither of my parents are employed at a corporation, so there is no corporate scholarship available for winning. </p>
<p>My first choice school is MIT, which offers no merit scholarships. (Second is Stanford... again no money)</p>
<p>In total, I would qualify for $2,500 at the most, which is a drop in the bucket at those schools. However, this is a prestigious scholarship (or so I've heard) which makes winning it have inherent value beyond the money. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, there are issues (because of course there are). The first and most important is time.</p>
<p>In addition to homework, three major clubs, starting my own club, building a part time phone repair business, and studying two standardized tests (ACT+Writing and SAT Subject: Physics) taking this scholarship would throw me into full study for a complete third test which I have never taken before. What free time I use to relax would vanish. Also, because of a very nice score on the ACT+Writing, the SAT, although certainly a wonderful test, is useless to me in any capacity except as qualifying for this single scholarship. </p>
<p>So my question is, as posted above, "Is the work worth the result"?</p>
<p>In my mind, it comes down to trading stress and free time for prestige, which I'm not sure I really need. Let me know if this sounds accurate, or if I should really reconsider. The counselors at my school are ambivalent about wether I should go for it or not, so I really do want another honest opinion (or two, or three, or even more than that!).</p>