<p>Nicobella, you are wise to be thinking about job prospects for lawyers at this stage of the game. It is true that the job market is a lot smaller now than it was way back when I got out of law school. (1987, long before you were born!)</p>
<p>I work inhouse (i.e., in the legal department) at a large company. Generally speaking, those are jobs that lawyers get after they have been in a private law firm for a number of years. Either the grind of the long law firm hours gets to them after awhile, or they realize they aren’t going to make partner (and very few do, especially equity partners, meaning those who actually share in the profits of the firm), and the lifestyle of the inhouse lawyer seems much more attractive even though the pay is substantially less. It’s not a pittance, mind you, in the grand scheme of things, but I do not make a salary comparable to my law school peers who stayed in law firms.</p>
<p>There’s a lot of competition for these inhouse jobs. I’ve interviewed amazing candidates with great experience, but when you only have one slot open in your unit, what can you do? You can’t hire them all. We generally end up going with the person we think will be the “better fit” for a corporate law department. And that is not a small thing – one thing that is extremely different about working inhouse vs. working at a law firm is that you are with your “clients” all the time. A lot of law firm lawyers, especially younger ones, talk about wanting to get out from behind their desks and have “client contact”, but you have that at an extreme level when you work inhouse. And while that’s good – I really like the business people I work with – you have to remember all the time that you are not dealing with other lawyers, and so the writing style and presentation style is way different from that of a firm. When I was at a law firm, my clients were mostly the inhouse lawyers of corporations, so you were still talking to other lawyers. Legal writing and analysis can get very stilted and detailed at times – most of senior management here needs the equivalent of an “elevator pitch” when they ask you your opinion. So it’s just a much different kind of practice. More “cut to the chase” – summarize first, details later…maybe. And be prepared for lots of involvement in all kinds of discussions and issues where you think, “Is there even a legal question here?” Because they don’t pay you by the hour, so lots of times I am invited to meetings where I’m maybe not needed, but they like the idea of the attorney listening in. Whatever, that’s okay. I learn the business that way, and that’s VERY important to be an effective inhouse lawyer. </p>
<p>Bottom line for me is: I love it! I went in house VERY early in my career, after only two years at a private firm, and I NEVER looked back. I’m sure I made a financial sacrifice, but it’s okay – I’ve managed to work full time and be a mom and juggle everything fairly well. (Some days better than others.) I was in the right place at the right time when the position opened up, because as I said, inhouse positions usually go to people 6 and 7 years out. But there was an opening for a junior attorney only a few years out, and the career placement officer at my law school mentioned it to me. (It’s always a good thing to keep in contact with your school’s placement office. I don’t know how they’re set up now, but in the old days, young alumni could come in and look at job listings in binders. I’m sure everything is online now.)</p>
<p>So…where’s all this going? My advice would be, if you want to go to law school, as everyone else said, go to a competitive college and do well there. Prep well for your LSAT and get into as good a law school as you can. While in school, check into internships at inhouse law departments – it is always good to make contacts with the inhouse lawyers at different companies. When they are looking for a full time person later on, it could well be you. </p>
<p>Hope some of this was helpful. Sorry to go on for so long! </p>