<p>For me, there are two problems here. One is the issue of proportionality. I mean, someone could also use the argument “well, you broke the rule/were irresponsible/made a mistake, so the consequences are on your head” to justify executing people who made a sloppy reporting error on their taxes, but I think most of us would pretty strongly dissent from that line of reasoning. Docking a kid for lateness is one thing (and something I firmly believe in in most cases); denying honors credit to someone who has otherwise been doing the work of an honors course seems an overreaction. </p>
<p>The other issue is that to be a genuine learning experience, the “lesson” needs to be something with actual real world applicability. When I deduct points for late papers, I do so in part because it isn’t doing a student any favors not to teach him or her that missing a deadline has consequences. I really don’t think, however, that there are a lot of real world equivalents to the scenario described by the OP. First of all, it is pretty typical, even in the adult world, to give and get reminders of impending deadlines rather than relying on a months in advance notification. But even in cases where one does have to monitor due dates more closely, the dynamic is usually very different than the one described here.</p>
<p>For instance, keeping track of deadlines for conference proposals - many of which are posted well in advance of the due date - is important for my professional development, but then, I could have no reasonable expectation, in that case, that anyone would remind me in the interim; it is understood by everyone that if you want to apply, you keep track of the dates for the main conferences in your field and get your abstracts in (although even there,while you won’t get a personal reminder, conference organizers will often repost the call for papers on relevant, field-specific websites a couple of times before the deadline). In this case, however, the ordinary and natural expectation would be that a teacher who you see at least several times a week would, as a matter of course, at least refer to an upcoming assignment at some point between the distribution of the syllabus in September and a December or January due date - in fact, if it is a big enough assignment to warrant these kinds of consequences, I’d say you’re a pretty lousy high school teacher if you haven’t said a peep in preparation. There’s often no need to review a syllabus, because the ongoing relationship you have with the teacher trumps a preliminary schedule that may well be modified as the semester progresses.</p>
<p>Frankly, if OP’s question had been “There is a project mentioned on the syllabus, but S’s teacher hasn’t said anything about it - should he remind her, or leave well enough alone?” while I would have advised S to double-check with the teacher, my assumption would have been that the teacher had changed her plans since the beginning of the semester, not that she was trying to trick students into forgetting about a key course requirement by maintaining an inexplicable silence about her expectations for the assignment. </p>