<p>Thanks, Stressed Out Mom. Hope I did not sound too hard. One of my favorite vents is the way schools stress that this is the kid's thing--applying to colleges, picking the colleges, interviewing, building the resume, etc, etc. The kid should call, the kid should research, etc. When they go to college, the parents should take a hands off stance. But ultimately it is the parents who choose where kids go to college. Take a family that could afford Harvard for the kids according to the financial statements. But mom and dad won't pay. Other priorities. Kid gets accepted, and tough luck for him. No way he'll get a dime from Harvard because his parents have the money. Not till he is age 24 will he be considered independent. By then he is adult by every other definition for several years except for independence from parents financially for undergraduate education. Crazy, huh? I think illegal and I would love to see this one challenged. There is no reason for this except for financial. </p>
<p>I would love to see a two year community/national/international service period instituted between the time a kid graduated from highschool and can go to college with the activities done during this time counting heavily in the process and with money building up during for tuition. By the time the kid is about 20/21, a lot of the amusement park items in the colleges can be eliminated, and the an austerity program could be instituted to bring the costs down further. It would then level the playing field greatly as kids will have been on their own for that time period and less is dependent on parental ability to pay. I have a put together some models in this area, and wish it could come about. So I was not being harsh with the poster, as I also feel it is unfair that by accident of birth, some kids just have it easier for things like college costs. But it is the same for all things, even more basic than education. I don't think it is fair any of those kids who go to the nasty school where I volunteer have to go there. They are only there because their family lives in that area districted for that school. Hardly a fair process when 40 minutes away or less, those kids whose parents were prescient enough to buy or rent in a good district are in a much better environment.</p>
<p>Son is now healthy and happy; no bone marrow transplant needed, though we did break down the insurance roadblocks on that. And I now have a decent car, a nice house, and my kids are in a good school. But I was no less deserving of this back then than I am deserving of it now, and the kids are just pawns in this whole situation.</p>
<p>As for anxiety about college, it is nice to keep in in perspective, but when it is the major subject looming in front of you, it is goign to be stressful. We want the best for our kids, want them to get what they deserve. As much as we try to keep things in perspective, it is often the little things in life that bring on the rages and the disappointments. There is a sense of fate intervening on the bigger things, but with the college deal, you always wonder if you had just done everything a little better. Most families go through this angst. I know I was uncertain of what to do many times with my kids' college journies. And even when you get exactly what you want, something usually comes up that is another pain in the neck. It is a fortunate soul indeed that glides through this experience. We, in this family, have yet to do this.</p>