<p>that question wasnt experimental, i think. i only took 3 math sections.</p>
<p>and that one i actually used the ti 89 and when i was down to the 2 last things, i just plugged them in with 2^1001 xD</p>
<p>the calc actually took a long time to process it and i think it made me take longer than usual</p>
<p>-edit</p>
<p>im talking about the one that somoeone just asked that had like</p>
<ul>
<li>somethings thats greater than 2 to the 1000,
and it gave u things like ((x^1000 + 2)/2 )^2
and you had to figure out which one was the greatest</li>
</ul>
<p>what was the answer to the math problem where it took one girl 15 min to paint a fence and another kid 10 min to paint a fence, and how many fences they would paint together in 1 hr?</p>
<p>I didn’t have the pentagon and circle plane question-it was definitely experimental.
Rofl-what did you say for that question in post #394? I think I just plugged in big numbers and saw which one got a bigger result. Lol.</p>
<p>I got 22 the first time, but I did it another way as well and 22 didn’t make sense. Did you think it was a 10x10 square? I was pretty sure it was actually a 10x12 rectangle.</p>
<p>I dunno if this was experimental, but there was a math question with no diagram but it said there were points A, B, C, D, E in that order. It gave you the lengths of AC, CE, and some other thing (don’t remeber clearly). My answer was that there was not sufficient information. Can anyone tell me if this was experimental or not? The question was a bit sketchy lol</p>