<p>I put however bc nothing else made sense. What was the composer one?</p>
<p>i put however, but thought it might have been consequently, but she didnt really go to africa as a consequence of being a doctor.</p>
<p>what could have been added to the second paragraph to make it better? I put details as to why she changed careers to often.</p>
<p>Few Such was right Imo</p>
<p>paige, I put those answers as well, and I was also stuck on whether it was however/consequently</p>
<p>^ i put however</p>
<p>i put however cause none of the words made sense in the sentence</p>
<p>was more underlined....or was most underlined</p>
<p>Wait did anyone get two No Errors in a row?</p>
<p>was more underlined....or was most underlined</p>
<p>and no zingzong</p>
<p>How many can you miss on Writing and still 800?</p>
<p>i think i did zing zong... they were my only 2 no errors</p>
<p>There was some question (not sure whether experimental or not) about learning at a slower rate. I believe Winston Churchill was mentioned. I thought A sounded awkward, but nothing was wrong with the sentence grammatically.</p>
<p>zingzong..</p>
<p>there might have been 2 no errors in a row...</p>
<p>one mbe the more vs most</p>
<p>and one about oysters.</p>
<p>It was the oysters one and the "few such" vessels one.</p>
<p>wat was the oysters question again. i def. said no error..but i dont remember the question</p>
<p>zingzong, i got two no errors in a row! also on my diagnostic sats (lol) i got an 800 on writing with five wrong so it's at least possible.</p>
<p>does anybody remember the oysters qs</p>
<p>WHATTTTTTT</p>
<p>was the "most prolific of" one?</p>
<p>which was written .. more or most?</p>
<p>I only got one No Error- the one about oysters. </p>
<p>The one before oysters: Is it "[the composer] was the most prolific of either Bach or Handel" or "[the composer] was more prolific than either Bach or Handel"? If it's the former, it's no error (that was the original sentence). I think it's the latter, cuz it was "either...or"</p>