<p>seize and take for granted seemed as possible answers for me. I guess I chose the wrong one :(</p>
<p>
ok thx… i think i changed it to that. :D</p>
<p>suabemulch, I put that it did something with the opening paragraph…</p>
<p>The example of the secretory protein or whatever expanded the generalizations.</p>
<p>sunshower, im same with u. I definitely had 4 CR passages and no Writing till section 7. Im trying to figure out my experimental CR section.</p>
<p>Why is it “precedent for”? Question was like judges making a ruling that someone is gonna break or something.</p>
<p>Someone explain please.</p>
<p>I agree with naduod, I also put the expanding blah blah</p>
<p>plain/ornate is wrong.
it was something like…</p>
<p>The anicent greek columns are white, making them___<strong><em>, while the antiquates are colorful and less </em></strong>__. </p>
<p>First blank should be a synonym of simple and second blank should be a synonym of less liked. so austere/unadorned</p>
<p>it was something like that although my memory is ehh right now</p>
<p>jasonInNY, did you have inveigle on one of your sections? because according to this list, it’s experimental. Also, precedent is something that always has to do with legal stuff. The case is supposed to break “new legal ground”, so there was no precedent (a precedent is a ruling from a previous case to show the court that the law is usually interpreted a certain way and a similar case. but there was not similar case for this)</p>
<p>There were no precedents of a court case like it, so whatever the judges decided, it would be a completely new decision concerning something new (“breaking new grounds” as the question put it).</p>
<p>That’s why it was precedents of</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It said something about how the Greek sculptures were ______ because they were plain and white, but newly discovered antiques had color and thus were not ______ like the other Greek ones. That’s just a very vague description as I can no longer remember the actual question.</p>
<p>v No experimental section answers included v
Sentence Completion - COMPLETE</p>
<p>Debilitate/Disheartening
Progenitor/Exploit
Penchant/Locution
Bolster
Rancor
Unflappable
Established/Mitigate
Prodigy/Anonymity
Austere/Unadorned
Acute
Emotional/Literal
Cajolery/Undertake
Diversity/Unpalatable
Integral/Extinction
Steadfast
Fraudulent
Altruistic
Impromptu
Precedent For</p>
<p>Reading Questions</p>
<p>Father’s face was tender
Writer’s motto comes off as arrogant
Something wistfulness
Cards to cards - Continuous Sequence
Writing a novel Passage 1 was didactic
Father’s comparison to cowboy - Wild exuberance
Father refusal to pick up soldier - Disloyal
Example of another reason - Inexpensive motel
Father isn’t fair - Right
True writers - Genuine writers
Thieves analogy - Unaccustomed freedom
Businesses use novelty
Two authors agree that humor is not acceptable in all situations
Traveling by river vs land is different because river is unambiguous
The question from the old man was to emphasize one of the author’s points
Tunisian passage details author’s feelings of being a foreigner
Trick means feat
Author says how scientists choose to specialize in a field of study is “no matter”
Brand new shoe evokes sensory image</p>
<p>incredibly relieved. looks like I got all the ones I wasn’t sure of right.</p>
<p>too bad english was so ridiculous…</p>
<p>How much do you guys think is a -5 raw (4 wrong) score?
Thanks.</p>
<p>-5 raw is probably 740</p>
<p>^
<a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<p>Yeah…and how much do you guys think will a -4 (3 wrongs) have?</p>
<p>what about the question on the scientist/research passage asking what the significance of some discovery in a cell was… sorry thats really vague, but I don’t really remember the question or the answer, just know its missing from your list.</p>
<p>Why is it unaccustomed freedom?
Didn’t the passage say, “… with every place we went…”
I put steady progression or something.</p>
<p>This one and the “assume” one I’m not sure of.</p>
<p>I’m praying I didn’t miss more than two questions…</p>
<p>Thanks Randwulf and Jersey13. Going for a 2340 then.</p>
<p>yo guys how did both of the guys support humor is not acceptable in the workplace, while one was focused on the consequences of humor?</p>
<p>@book2book</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the choice said that humor was not accept at all times.
One talked about humor being necessary for life but that it is not fitting for a workplace environment. The other, I believe, talked about the consequences of humor.</p>