<p>also, author of one of the two humor passages tone concerning comedian executives in the work force? I think ambivalent and sceptic were choices…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That passage was focused on the NEGATIVE consequences of humor in the WORKPLACE. So the author obviously believes that humor isn’t acceptance in the workplace.</p>
<p>book2book, I think the question you’re talking about had the answer “Humor is not appropriate in all situations” or something like that…that’s what they both agreed on.</p>
<p>@EternalHeart</p>
<p>It is “unaccustumed freedom” because they were able to get away from the city and go on the road trip. Thus, Virgil was able to see his father in a new way and open up to him.</p>
<p>Which sections were experimental? Sorry to ask again, but I felt my question was lost.</p>
<p>wait why was it emotional/and literary? Shouldn’t it have been objective/and truth or something?</p>
<p>thnx… oh boy i didn’t do so well on CR hope theres a good curve cause i felt that there was tough vocab. …
Math should counterweigh the CR (i hope 
)</p>
<p>Passage I was discussing the consequences for humor in businesses. Passage II was being generous about humorous employees. All of you need to see the overall carefully. Both passages agree in the ways of helping to make companies more with professionals. Passage I said that non-humor is professional, while Passage II claimed that humor is considered a factor of professional among many employees.</p>
<p>also, I didn’t think it was altruistic? I thought it was punctulicious or something.</p>
<p>^@Riley, the answer was emotional/literal because in the previous sentence it said something like her autobiography focused on mood, not fact; emotional truth corresponds to mood and literal truth to fact</p>
<p>crap. I had that, but then thought an autobiography would be “objective.”</p>
<p>what was the experiemental one for CR
was it the television program one?</p>
<p>jersey -
the answer is not rancor because it was about the shameful delegates - rancor means bitter…it should be compunction
also, isn’t the sentence completion with austere/unadorned supposed to be opposites
i put plain/ornate.</p>
<p>^ again @ Riley, it said that though the deeds of the girl generally benefited others, she only acted out of self-interest, therefore she could not be considered altruistic (giving of yourself in other’s interest)
punctilious means “strict or exact in the observance of the formalities or amenities of conduct or actions,” which is not really related</p>
<p>@york- It’s rancor because it was what they PROVOKED</p>
<p>What was the SC with “mitigate”? I forget</p>
<p>WHICH ONE WAS THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION?
WAS IT SECTION 6? the passgage aobut television?</p>
<p>heyyy you know the astronomy short single passage? there is a question on why it was such a headache to early astronomers. was it because “it disproved the early theories” or was it because “it could not accurately predict the astronomical phenomonens”?</p>
<p>and another question, the humor within workplace short double passage, was the second writer’s attitude towards the humor consultants ambivalent or skeptical ?</p>
<p>^@york, I would second that. It didn’t seem right to me that shameful actions would result in extreme bitterness or hatred</p>
<p>also, anyone know which writing section was the experimental?</p>
<p>why would ‘disgraceful behavior’ provoke compunction (uneasiness or anxiety about the conscience) from others?</p>
<p>‘rancor’ is pretty much confirmed</p>
<p>@bbbbbbbblove</p>
<p>I put it couldn’t be accurately predicted and skeptical</p>