<p>I said both had to do with historical views about Cold War or something… Memory is very fuzzy on that one</p>
<p>Yes I put antithetical!!</p>
<p>@Mystic, i’m not sure exactly what the answer choices were for that one, but im pretty sure that william thought that the policy was “more politically palatable” (right?), as in he was not as harsh as the new left revisionists on the us’ diplomacy but still critical</p>
<p>I remember putting fallacious.</p>
<p>any context on “antithetical” question? i only vaguely remember</p>
<p>The question involved Truman I think.</p>
<p>it was something about the actions of the u.s.</p>
<p>@glasses1 but they were saying compared to the guy, the later revisionists… Weren’t the later revisionists harsher because they mentioned that the guy was nicer?</p>
<p>I also remember politically palatable as an answer choice that I specifically did not choose, because I don’t think it was asking about William Appleman Williams’s view. What a name.</p>
<p>drawing a blank on antithetical quesiton. maybe i didnt put it… ? or just dont remember. if anyone could provide more context it’d be much appreciated. uhh @Mystic, yeah thats what i mean the later revisionists (new left) were harsher. william was not as harsh. did other people get that he thought us diplomacy (or whatever) was “more politically palatable”?</p>
<p>oh. i thought it was asking about his views… like compared to the new left</p>
<p>@glasses1 it wasn’t more politically palatable.</p>
<p>noooo what was it. “less easy to criticize”? or whatever it was</p>
<p>It was something objectionable. The question referred to how the revisionists felt compared to William, not vise versa.</p>
<p>ahh. must have misread it while rushing. hopefully theres a decent curve for critical reading</p>
<p>If jntx3 is right, it has to be something about Truman, because that was the big clash between New Left and Williams in the passage.</p>
<p>I really wish I could remember this. I know one of the questions is that US economical expansionism was to blame, rather that Soviet political expansionism. Did you guys say move = advance?</p>
<p>yeah i got that radicalness. that economica expansion of us was more to blame than political expansion of soveit union. and yes i said move meant to advance</p>
<p>Do you think missing 1 on reading and skipping 2 can still be an 800?</p>
<p>the truman one was that retaliation was appropriate b/c of aggressiveness of soviet policy or something like that</p>
<p>right?</p>
<p>Yes! I also put objectionable too. It was a hard question I didn’t really understand some of the answer choices.</p>