<p>has anyone found this method to ACTUALLY work on the SAT's??</p>
<p>no and it never will</p>
<p>why?</p>
<p>to know that the answer is one joe bloggs would pick, one must think like him and be stupid, but if one knows one is stupid then one is obviously not stupid.</p>
<p>(confusing i know)</p>
<p>like my history teacher says:</p>
<p>"the smart people are the ones that know what they know, and know what they don't know."</p>
<p>hahahah yes, that is a very good point.</p>
<p>i always read the SAT book, and when it tells me the Joe Bloggs answer, i'm like, "wow, i would have never thought that simplistically"</p>
<p>i officially hate the SAT.</p>
<p>Maybe it only works if you're missing the first 10 or so in a 20-25 question set. After that, it takes logic, not simplistic thinking, so . . by the way, I don't have any PR/Bloggs books, but it doesn't seem like an effective method.</p>
<p>w00t 30 posts till the newly released sarorah 3000</p>
<p>It sort of does work, it helps you to realize the different question levels...in terms of actually imagining "what would joe bloggs pick?" it doesn't help, but it helps you to realize that if you think of an answer to question 20 in a math section within 5 secons it must be wrong</p>
<p>jyankees, that is a good point. i havent really thought of it that way.</p>