<p>i also remember</p>
<p>reconciliation … insuperable</p>
<p>for a SC question</p>
<p>Yeah I think I got those two answers…</p>
<p>sci-fry,</p>
<p>are you sure you’re talking about the same question?</p>
<p>cause i didn’t solve it that way</p>
<p>Are you talking about the one with the gradient being between 0.5 and 0.55, and you had a horizontal distance of 2 and vertical distance of 3 and you had the find the length of the slanted bit?</p>
<p>The slope question was like 1.98 or lower I think. (1.98 gives you a slope of 0.51).</p>
<p>I put juror could be manipulated. It was the only one that made sense, the only thing in the 2nd passage that talked about manipulation was talking about ambiguity + confusion if the lawyer doesn’t speak well or something.</p>
<p>Sci-Fry ,
You should have got a value between 1.90 and 2.00 .</p>
<p>What did you get for the constant questoin .THe one where you had sth like x^2 - 8x - k = 0 that has only one solution.K was deff 16.</p>
<p>What about the slope question just before the question about ‘‘if I learn ,I will take the exam’’ I think it was 32…</p>
<p>t + y < 8
lights 6
probability question 1/24
area of shaded region in the 3 circles ==> 10pi
Possible valuse between 35 and 350 (5x+1) ==>53</p>
<p>It wasn’t the length of the slanted bit but of the vertical…(it was like OA or something, which referred to the vertical.)</p>
<p>Hey CR7 do you remember what the question was? Maybe I misread?</p>
<p>Dammit, I think I misread quite a few questions. Felt pressurized because this is my first time…</p>
<p>****!! I misread 3 questions! So my answer would simply be 3-1.05=1.95!! AHH that’s so simple! NOOO!</p>
<p>CR7, those are all right.</p>
<p>Frig. Got the 53 question wrong. So stupid. Hoping for a lenient curve.</p>
<p>^^ yea i know i how u feel
i got the stupid slope question wrong
i put 0.4… i dont know what i was thinking … lmao messed up the numbers in the equation i guess</p>
<p>Me 2 .Even though I still havent found a single error, it is possible to have made some stupid mistake.The girl behind me was so stupid.She asked me about the 53 question,I told her it was 53 but she insisted on 54 …</p>
<p>I had 53 in first, but then when I was reading it, I saw the word between so I thought it wouldn’t include the first number…so it would be 52. But then that +1 on 5x takes care of that problem. Didn’t realize as I had like 20 seconds to decide!</p>
<p>Yeah, I had like no time to figure out the slope question, so I ended up misreading it… I was on the right path and practically saw the answer along the way :(</p>
<p>The math can generally be considered as hard.There were some hard questions like the one with the diagonal of the solid figure and this 53 question.Some grid-ins were also hard</p>
<p>I found it more difficult than the BB ones…the one with the average age increased by 2 when one person was removed and another added that was 12 years older was pretty confusing. (It was 6 people in the group right?). It took a while to figure out.</p>
<p>Do you think -2 in Math might equal 770. I really hope so! I’m retaking in October because this is my first time, but I still want a decent math score. It had some pretty hard questions that would take a while to answer if you don’t understand things like factorials (e.g. the 1/24 question).</p>
<p>Urgh, I really wish I didn’t mess up that slope question. I knew when I was reading it that I was rushing…</p>
<p>Yep ,they were 6.Sci-Fry ,did you got these 6 people ?</p>
<p>6 people, yeah (if you’re talking about the mean age one).</p>
<p>EDIT:</p>
<p>I did:</p>
<p>16n + 12 = 18n
2n = 12
n = 6</p>
<p>What was the question before that? I think I got 7 for the question before.</p>
<p>Oh, and was there an “experimental” math section since I had 4 sections, and what exactly does this mean? How does the curve work for it?</p>
<p>One of them doesn’t count towards anything. (One of the 25 min ones) I think it was the one with the logic question.</p>