<p>@marjerina Oh, I wasn’t talking about you, I was talking about the OP who simply said in a post “Your wrong.” I’m not hostile, just trying to keep things credible – because if people are just like “You’re wrong”, there’s really no point!</p>
<p>The roman restaurants was experiment, correct?</p>
<p>Its watershed moment. I’m like 99.9% sure.</p>
<p>I got vanguard also, mainly because I was between that and purview and they used vanguard in the next passage :D</p>
<p>What would the curve be for -6?</p>
<p>Yeah begoodperson. I had nothing on roman restaurants (although I had a CR experimental).</p>
<p>roman restaurants? yea thats experimental
i remember the guy reading a book to some blinding author, the psychology of talent, the austrian girl, and louisa may alcott
which one of mine are experimental?</p>
<p>LOL^I hope, it would be deserved with the vocab, and that d@mn aurtrian girl…</p>
<p>Carmen - sorry then! Lol, I thought it was to me, I didn’t even see the other post :P</p>
<p>@Rex…6 wrong or -6 on your raw score?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Hopefully decent, but I’m not really sure. A lot of people have been complaining about the SC…</p>
<p>Pioneering/Vanguard was right.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<p>Hopefully this curve is similar to the ones in red, but I think it will be yellowish.</p>
<p>Do you guys remember the passage based? These are the few I recall:</p>
<p>For the blinding author, I put down “perceive,” and that the passage was an unexpected event leading to a new understanding.
For psychology of talent - I had trouble with the question that asked "What statement did the passage as a whole support about the dichtomy (line 4)? I think I put down that it’s hard to prove with experiments.
For the Austrian girl - the same reaction to the opposite views one, and then for the question that asked for the purpose of the sentence that was like “She loved her father like she would love a horse…” I wrote that it elaborated on a previous sentence (the sentence before it was “Because she loved him.”</p>
<p>I was vacillating between pioneering and innovate. My final decision was pioneering, thanks to context clues about vanguard in next paragraph :)</p>
<p>can someone consolidate? thanks</p>
<p>yea and LOUISA MAY ALCOTT
was that experimental?
i remember the guy reading a book to some blinding author, the psychology of talent, the austrian girl, and louisa may alcott</p>
<p>@marjerina</p>
<p>I got all of those as well.</p>
<p>I got the same answers you did, marjerina, except 1 which I know is wrong (the opposite views one)</p>
<h2>Alcott was experimental.</h2>
<p>I’m consolidating. Give me 3 minutes.</p>