<p>I put Acolyte solely because it made me think of the Acolyte birds from back in my FFXI days.</p>
<p>…I don’t think I did too well with the vocabulary.</p>
<p>…I don’t think I did too well with the vocabulary.
^
I got two easy ones wrong and the rest right. ~ . ~</p>
<p>Overall the vocab was bad though.</p>
<p>Can someone explain why “impression versus reality” is correct for the Argentinian author passage? I thought the question specifically referenced “carefully annotated edition” and “notebook” – I thought it had more to do with the uniqueness of the author’s situation. 
Oh well…</p>
<p>I also put naive but it’s probably wrong. My logic was that passage two stated that those who criticize indys only looked at the poor films that were overly reliant on monetary funds. So I thought the passage was saying Passage 1 had a very narrow view, and was naive because of that restricted view.</p>
<p>@Fledgling</p>
<p>Because the author said “I felt as if I had a limited edition, but actually I was his notekeeper”. Remember this type of answer should be explicit in the text.</p>
<p>@fledgling: he mentioned something about “like many others before me” in parentheses.
wait, which passage was experimental though?</p>
<p>When can we know sat score online?</p>
<p>When can we know sat score online?
^
The 24th.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the question for ignomity or any other possible answers. For some reason it is not ringing a bell</p>
<p>I agree with fledgling. He was not a notebook in reality.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the question for ignomity or any other possible answers. For some reason it is not ringing a bell
^
The senator’s term was one of _______ because he’d been disgraced by a scandal…</p>
<p>something along those lines?
I know approbation was one of the incorrect choices.</p>
<p>The question was something about the corruption of a senator for ignominy.
fledgling - do you remember what the question was? I don’t remember…</p>
<p>isnt one of the answer halting …( cant remember the rest) explaining why the mentor kept on stopping and addressing him</p>
<p>Alright… I’ll just assume you all are right. I could’ve SWORN the question said: “The words “carefully annotated edition” (Line _<em>) and “notebook” (Line _</em>) serve to indicate…” though… bleh, what do I know? :/</p>
<p>** – S/C – ** 13/19
Diverse
Devised
Ignomity
Acolyte
Ubiquitous
Apoplectic
Charismatic
Provisional
Matured, Fulfilling
???, Upbraid
Underdog
Pioneer, Vanguard
Complicity, exonerated of</p>
<p>– Short P –</p>
<p>Rachel Carson story
Marking a watershed moment in public
Respectful</p>
<p>???
Make a claim
Debatable</p>
<p>Independent Films
passage 1 is more disgusted (something along those lines)
familiar and overly alarmed</p>
<p>** – Long P – **</p>
<p>Talent/Practice
to examine a psychological experiment
“account” = explained
blurred cause and effect</p>
<p>Boy and Author
Argentinian author and author reading stories aloud
Recount unusual experience –> new understanding
happy in his subordinate role
author’s impression with reality
apprehending –> perceiving
author’s lack of control
valuable for readers make connections w/ past readings</p>
<p>Girl
father wanted her to go on the trip “to learn about her non-English relatives”.
“freedom” means “releasing emotional burdens”
appalled = different viewpoints have equal values
likes her grandfather because “he talked about the present”
felt “disdain” for parent’s nostalgia
“loved father like she loved a horse” = elaborate on previous sentence</p>
<p>Zoo
products of human culture
condition: state of being
spectatorship: strong disapproval
savvy about nature of zoos
curiosities on display for audience
unconcerned with debates about zoo
fun comes at the expense of real insight of animals
do not offer authentic experience of wild animals
passage 1 makes argument that passage 2 finds unpersuasive</p>
<p>anyone remember what the passage was after the rachel carson one?</p>
<p>Yes, the question went “The prime minister’s term was marked by _____ due to his involvement in the scandal.”</p>
<p>fledgling - It did say that. What did you put down? I can’t remember at all what I had for some reason.</p>
<p>There was an SC question about kudzu…something…rampant.</p>
<p>I remember 'cause I got it wrong. |D</p>
<p>I am with fledgling for the Argentinean passage. The carefully annotated quality created a sense of speciality.</p>
<p>The “independent films” passage was a short passage correct?</p>