Does anyone have a PDF version of the test
Also hilariously the question 18 days it models the population of a city in millions after 2010, but that would mean that this city had a population of 110 MILLION in 2010 and in 2017 has a population of 145 MILLION. The numbers themselves are very unreasonable because I know of no city anywhere near this population.
Can someone email the answers?
Make sure it’s not a scam please
@kimclan1 can u please send me that answers rahishah9876@gmail.com
1 1
2 1
3-6 i didn’t get for some reason
7 4
8 1
9 2
10 3
11 1
12 2
13 3
14 2
15 4
16 4
17 4
18 2
19 1
20 3
21 3
22 3
23 4
24 2
25 r(2)=-6, means that x-2 is not a factor
26 69%
27 (x^2+4)(4x-1)
28 graph the exponential, starts at 394 and decays
29 didn’t get
30 x=5 (x=8 was extraneous)
31 x^5/6
32 more likely to jog if both siblings jog (18% vs 22%)
33 didn’t get
34 mortgage: $1247, Down Payment: $20,407
35 Graph the log, y intercept (0, -3.4…) x intercept (29,0). As x–>-3, y–>-infinity. As x–>infinity, y–> infinity
36 (.35, .66), they stopped because 32.5% is significant, proving the assumption false
37 100=140(.5)^5/t
h=10.3002
18.6 hours until it gets to 40 grams
@stechin sure
So with the spinner, he spun 0/10 6’s. When his dad created the simulation, 6 was spun 0 times in about 20% of the simulations. This is not significant (more than 5%) so there is no statistical evidence to prove the spinner is unfair
this thread has 492 posts and more than 18,000 views, while our Global thread has 55 posts and about 5,000 views, and the Global regents was first haha
anyone has the pdf version of the test w the answer?
Don’t think so…NYSED has gotten a little strict these past few years about answers being posted
trouty2001@gmail.com plzzzz i need answers thank u:)))
So no PDF version
@stechin i picked 3 too, and i remember being torn about it too.(originally chose 2 lol) It makes sense because 20 percent of the time it never landed, so it was likely this was one of them. It was the only choice that used the simulation properly, if this was a short answer I would have no clue.
@J1234567890 I didn’t have the best teacher for this class so I have no idea what you mean by “significant.” Also, where did 5% come from
@acceptmyname I chose Choice 1) which no one else here apparently chose hahaha. I honestly didn’t know how to read the data in the graph so I guess that’s a huge reason why I got most of the statistical problems wrong
It was .03922, so it would be 3.922, which can be 3.922 % or 4% depending on how you round it @kimclan1
For #36 if I said less than 5% preffered the new procedure, would that be wrong?
So what about answers to 3-6