<p>I'm pretty sure it's starch....end of discussion.</p>
<p>.... its not starch ok? can we get the facts straight and yes i agree with whoever was talking about the chemistry... FAT HAS THE MOST ENERGY! please lets not discuss it anymore.</p>
<p>No, guys, they're right. [EDIT: THIS IS SARCASTIC]</p>
<p>Let's just give in to the fact that they seem to think they know their stuff better than we do... even though we all took the same classes and learned all the same stuff...</p>
<p>It seems to me that those people who think it's fats are getting mighty rude about it.</p>
<p>Sooo in that case why don't you take your OWN advice, stop acting like you're superior than everyone (because we all OBVIOUSLY took Chemistry, alexinorbit..), and be mature. Alright?</p>
<p>Sounds good. :)</p>
<p>"Human Nutrition". Microsoft Encarta Reference Library 2003. CD-ROM. Microsoft Corporation, 2002.</p>
<p>"Fats, which provide 9 calories of energy per gram, are the most concentrated of the energy-providing nutrients, so our bodies need only very small amounts."</p>
<hr>
<p>Fats produce more than twice as much energy as carbohydrates. Fats are compact fuels efficiently stored in the body for later use when carbohydrates are in short supply.</p>
<hr>
<p>Lipids store Energy Efficiently. They have Large Numbers of Carbon-Hydrogen Bonds, which store More Energy than Carbon-Oxygen Bonds common in other Organic Compounds.
Lipid molecules have a HIGHER Ratio of Carbon and Hydrogen Atoms To Oxygen Atoms than Carbohydrates have.</p>
<p>Ok, it was fats--that was clarified for the millionth time already. I think it would also be better if we could recall some other multiple choice, right?</p>
<p>Hmmm....my evidence seems a bit more convincing than your outside sources. Do you not think it is possible that I know more than this Microsoft Encarta program?</p>
<p>cb should just throw it out. :p</p>
<p>it's a challening questions... a true "hanging chad"</p>
<p>I just want to shake hands with the people who word the questions...</p>
<p>More evidence: Campbell's 6th edition, pg. 70 (middle right) and pg. 172 (lower left).</p>
<p>I totally lucked out because I remember reading the passage on page 70 for a study guide for class. But I still think it was a cheap question about a rather obscurre fact.</p>
<p>good call.</p>
<p>now time for some Bud!</p>
<p>I still think the XX, and XO was an obscure question--but I don't feel like having everyone flip out again.</p>
<p>i dont understand why they must keep talking about it... its in the books and its in other sources and its in some of the prep books... im not acting superior...its just annoying how she keeps insisting. so we're not really being anal...we already concluded it... if you cant face the fact that you got something wrong...then well...yur beyond me.</p>
<p>Now that we are in a moment of reconciliation, posts #341 and #346 were total sarcasm on my part. Sorry for the confusion, but I enjoy heated debates over an internet forum.</p>
<p>lol yur not the annoying one... its the other person..</p>
<p>wow ivyleague or bust, why do you dwell on a single problem you already took. It's done and over. We already discussed that issue a million times. Come on. TYPICAL women are not effed up in genetic terms (lmao.). I think of typical of at least over 50% right? DO yo usee half the population with women that's disabled?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <h2>No.</h2>
<h2>Previous post: im just saying ppl can refer to the previous threads for their answers instead of just asking the questions nonchantly, and by the fact that the people who chose a certain answer are so eager to pound it into other's heads even though ppl are bringing up effing encarta evidence. How can you not disagree with those kinds of evidence. I'ts cool whatever.</h2>
<p>It's fat because think about it even without bio chemical reactions and such.. Carbs are stored as fat when there is an abundance. I'm 100% sure it's fat. I even asked my bio AP teacher, and she's a genius.. at a public school? lmao.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Carbs are used as an immediate energy source while fat is the stored carbs. It's like same as files on computers. If you have hella documents and vid files that is like 2 gigabytes and you want to send it to your friend, then you would put it into winzip. It's the same amount just that it's compressed into a smaller file in a different unit... THEREFORE, if you make it so that there are same number of bytes of a winzip and the original files, you'll notice you will maybe have 1.5 as much as you started at with.. or sometimes twice or more--depending on the file.</p>
<p>I'm not sure if you can understand that because I know sometimes my analogies can be understood only by me hehehe.</p>
<p>"lol yur not the annoying one... its the other person.."</p>
<p>If I cared, I would appologize. But since you're being nothing but rude to me, I don't, and I won't.</p>
<p>You have your views, I have mine. I brought up that question to put my source out there. Not to start another conversation. Besides. There's just as much supporting detail (in other places other than Campbells) for starch as there is for fats. I learned from my teacher that it was starch.</p>
<p>You can think what you want, but you're not going to change my opinion. Besides, I believe it's you who's keeping this conversation going.</p>
<p>Are you guys planning on taking the SAT in June. </p>
<p>I am and I'm a bit apprehensive as I am a freshman and I have NO IDEA WHAT TO STUDY. It seems from this post that most prep books dont really prep you...</p>
<p>yeah, the real deal?</p>
<p>I am prepping daily. I want a 2100+ on this bad boy.</p>
<p>longislandgirl, I asked my ap bio teacher and she said that is a tricky one and would need to know more information on what type of fat, etc...</p>
<p>I guess I agree with you.. but whatever, the CollegeBoard is the person who matters in this debate.</p>
<p><------ACT in June.</p>
<p>good luck :D</p>
<p>ivyleague, you got msn? PM me it ;P</p>