I don’t think you will be disappointed after reading this. It’s not even long compared to most guides, so stop watching your low-tier waifu/anime and read.
Guess it’s time to repay this wonderful community. I dedicate this to all of my waifus (anime and irl) hehe.
Hopefully, this will help some people before they phase out the 2400 SAT.
Into: Each person is different, but this guide will try to present a foolproof plan which you must improve upon individually. I can tell you to write a sentence, but you determine how good that sentence is. Note that I believe there is a relatively significant “foundations” factor, but I assure you it’s more about prior learning/reading than how “smart” you are (if that can be defined).
1.Essay
Arguably the easiest part of the test (or writing) for anyone with decent writing or that intuitive “it sounds right” feeling. As others like academichacker have proposed, you must make a universal template. But I want to take this concept deeper. The main problems with templates are 1. example quality and 2. terribad structure. Assuming you follow the 5 paragraph standard essay, your examples should be diverse and attack the subject from different perspectives. Try chronological order: eg1=ancient civilization, eg2=literary, eg3=contemporary/personal. This sequence will guarantee a consistent format.
Then is structure. Time is really short so you must have a pre-written template whenever possible. This means almost your entire intro should be predetermined. You will write a template and memorize it. A very simple intro template might look like this:
General statement. When A and B, will ultimately C. Acknowledge opposite side of argument. Several events from the lives of X, Y, and Z demonstrate the power of to D.
If you are a good writer, you will have less absolute structure because you can write a “general statement” better than you can some fixed line. If you are not as prolific, I advise you to write a more rigid template, at least for the intro.
The body paragraphs will have pre-written intros which should tell us, in preferably 1 sentence, topic, perspective, result. Topic=like your thesis eg. Honesty is good Perspective=how our example attacks this thesis eg. when Sam cheated on his SAT. Result=should be quite significant eg. he received a zero, undermining his reputation and costing him a job at ArcelorMittal. Notice that this is rather specific. SAT loves details. Don’t just say his reputation dipped. Write about his precise score, his personal and financial loses. It wasn’t just any job offer. It was a job at the prestigious sounding ArcelorMittal. In the body, you will describe, specifically but concisely, what happened and the consequences. Now, use your predetermined transition for the next body paragraph. For me, I had two set transitions depending on the relationship between the two paragraphs. (eg. one for a similar perspective, one for a counterexample.) Use a counterexample. This is often best in your personal example because it’s easier to make it up. Oh yes, by the way, you are making these up. No matter how much your tutor wishes for you to memorize Steve Job’s memoir, you yourself will be able to come up with unique, impressionable examples which can be used universally. Why bother wasting your life and deciding which examples to use when you can make examples up on the spot. Of course, you will specifically look over CC’s consolidated list of essay prompt archetypes and generate a suitable example which fits every one. Eg. The sample ancient Greece essay on CB can be very universal. You will usually end up talking about a Greek general/ruler if it’s a prompt like “is honesty good.” A general can also notice the “little details” or have guidance from “experienced elders.” You get the point. Repeat this process with your 3 examples, not forgetting to prepare for “technological progress” which stumps ancient Greece. However, I find that there are no exceptions like technology if you play your cards right.
Your conclusion is similar to your intro, fully structured already. You should also acknowledge the opposite argument, but downplay it with your thesis. Eg. Although deception may be occasionally justified in exceptional circumstances, honesty will eventually prevail through the test of time. At the end, to fill up hopefully that last squished half-line, you will push the argument deeper. If it’s honesty/deception, write, after your repeated thesis, eg. In a world of social media and networking, it is of paramount importance that we uphold the quintessential values of honesty, integrity, and ethics. A finisher like this will triumph over your friends’ “end with a quote” or “make some bs up about politics.” Yes, your intro will be soon forgotten. It’s more important to end on this kind of fulfilling note.
Make sure to form a coherent argument which should ideally reflect American beliefs eg. don’t write about how great dishonesty can be even if you can fully support it. After reading your well structured essay, a coherent argument, diverse examples from ancient times to present, a counterexample, and subtle acknowledgement of the opposite side, the reader will say “Wow, finally someone with an ounce of sophistication. This DESERVES a 6!”
2.W Writing is also very simple. Get Erica Meltzer’s Ultimate Guide to SAT Grammar and memorize all the rules down to every little detail. This is by far the best resource I can recommend and goes beyond a typical list of rules into the niceties of test structure, etc. Then, just practice. You should be at a point where, if given unlimited time, you can answer every question perfectly. There is a bit of memorization required with idioms and prepositions. Just watch out for diction errors. See? Ez-pz
- M Math is very simple on the SAT. But even if you feel completely confident, you still end up getting one wrong. There is some studying to do. If you are not fully confident, you may want to brush up on each of the question types. I recommend Dr. Chung's SAT Math book. It has 67 question types and you will likely find a few you don't know. Standard review books are simply too easy. You need to look for higher level, quality resources like the 2 I've mentioned. Then, it's just about focus and reading the question.
This guide continues below.