Large Research Universities vs. Small Women's LAC

<p>I'm writing this post as a student who debated between a large research university and a small women's college, and ended up choosing the large research university. While I am only half way through my first semester, I feel I can offer some helpful advice to those of you deciding between these two very different school types. Let me say that I am not trying to be over critical of my current school, as it is an excellent choice for many people. I simply wish to explain why it is not right for me, in the hope that other students can benefit from a different perspective on this issue.
First of all, I should say that I am seriously considering transferring next year, and I regret my decision to go to a large university. I chose to go to University of Michigan, and I am in the Residential College. U of M touts RC as being "a small liberal arts college within a large university". Oftentimes, people who argue for large universities say that there are many ways to "make the school smaller". The RC is one such way, as you have a few classes that are small seminar-style classes, and you "live and learn" in a dorm for two years. Indeed the RC does, to some extent, make the school smaller. However, the fact remains that you are in a large research university, and this dominates your academic and social life here. In other words, the advantages of the RC only go so far.
Socially, what I do not like about a large university is the Greek life, partying, and sports events. These things are very prevalent on campus. On football Saturdays, you can expect the campus to feel very empty, as many are in the stadium or watching the game on tv. If you are not very interested in sports, you will probably find it slightly tiresome when this topic creeps up in many of your conversations. In terms of Greek Life, the sad reality is that most of the stereotypes you've heard are true. And while some argue that only a small percentage of students join sororities or frats, I was surprised to see how prevalent Greek life is on campus. A huge number of people who didn't rush still frequent greek parties. To a large extent, social life revolves around frat parties and/or drinking and partying. Sororities always claim "sisterhood", but this is in NO way comparable to the sisterhood at a women's college. The "sisterhood" of sororities is extremely superficial, and most sororities would make feminists cringe.
Finally, and most importantly, I do not like the academics at a large university. Having one small discussion based class (because of the RC), I have experienced both the typical small LAC class and a giant lecture hall. I absolutely love this small class, and strongly dislike/hate my lecture classes. Proponents of large universities always point to the "brilliant" professors at universities. And maybe some of them are brilliant, but that does not necessarily help you as a student. Unfortunately, many, if not most, of the professors care mostly for their own research, and not for teaching. And you may have a brilliant teacher who graduated first in their class from a prestigious ivy-league school, but if you are in a class of hundreds of students, that doesn't really matter. You cannot absorb their brilliance simply from listening them speak for an two hours per week. If you never have any personal interaction with them, their credentials really become insignificant.
I cannot stress enough the benefit of having a teacher (the one from my small rc class) who actually cares about you- as an individual and as a student. Not to say that professors of large classes don't care, but they will probably never know your name, even if you go to office hours, and they are often very inaccessible to students. Having a teacher who is accessible (they have time for you) means that you can develop a personal relationship with them, they will help you with academics and with life in general. Especially when you are getting used to being away from your home, family, and old friends, this makes a HUGE difference.
I'm sorry this is going so long, and may be turning into a rant, but one more point: </p>

<p>Most women's colleges are small LAC colleges. In small liberal arts colleges, your classes involve a lot of reading and a lot of writing. In large lecture halls, you have very few, if any, chances to write (In a class of hundreds, it is often impossible to assign and grade writing assignments). Writing is probably one of the most important skills you can have, and if you are constantly doing it for class, you will greatly improve this skill. While lecture halls are a lot of just regurgitating information, small LAC classes involve discussion, writing, and critical thinking. </p>

<p>I could go on, but I feel I should cut myself off now. Feel free to respond and/or ask any questions you may have.</p>

<p>I am very sorry that you are having a tough time. Maybe things will change. I too went to a very large research oriented Institute, mine in Cambridge. I had a nobel laureate as a professor (in intro biology). Obviously a smart guy and a great researcher, but not a great prof of intro bio – a complete bore. It would have been better to have a less accomplished researcher and a better teacher. At the big universities, the profs are really more interested in their research, few are interested in teaching classes. My D, a soph at Mount Holyoke College has had 1.5 years of good profs, and they know her name, even in the large intro psychology class. She has had a number of very small classes 15-20 students which required her to work hard, but she also learned lots. She is happy and always wanted to be at a relatively small LAC, and one without the snobby frat/sorority scene. She applied to no universities. She wanted to be in a place where the profs knew her name and who could halp her individually. I however, as a HS senior, wanted to blend into the crowd. I got that, and I was happy, but looking back, now 35 years, I would have done better in many ways if I had gone to a LAC.</p>

<p>15college: I hope that you can tough it out. As you get into more advanced classes, the size of your classes WILL likely get smaller, and the profs and other students will know your name and you will (or can) get more individualized attention. As for the sports interest, that exists in “real life” too, with some being devoted to their favorite team(s). I for one don’t understand it, but it seems to be a fact of life, not only in the US but around the world. I was in a frat as a college student and had a lot of fun, not only at parties. Being in one made college life more bearable in a big school. And just because a college does NOT have frats/sororities does not mean that there is no drinking. If you are thinking of transferring (it seems to a women’s LAC), keep an eye on the deadlines. Realize that in your application to transfer you will likely have to express strong reasons why you want to transfer. Good luck.</p>

<p>Thank you for posting this and sharing it. It really helped me to consider smaller LACs even more, but I still intend to apply to my state’s universities just in case. </p>

<p>I’m sorry to hear that you’re having a tough time. I’m glad that you were able to identify your problems though and good luck on your transfer. I hope everything works out for you.</p>

<p>Thanks, state universities are definitely a good backup plan. But I also want to mention that there are still many good things about a large university. My previous post was only reasons I disliked the university, but it is not all terrible, I could write a post about the things I like about it too. I just think a better fit for me would be a small LAC, which is why I’m considering a transfer. Any college you go to you can find great people and great friends, but if major things like classes and the atmosphere in general are not a good fit, I think it is a good idea to look at another school. LAC’s seem to stress individual thought and attention, which I would love to have in a college experience. Thank you for your replies.</p>

<p>Yeah, there are numerous benefits to a large university, but I don’t think I can thrive there as much as a small LAC. I think for me that college is a place where I will at least be able to choose some of my experiences, compared to simply being placed in a HS based on location. I never really enjoyed my larger classes in HS, but I did like the more intimate setting of my smaller classes, where we were able to have more discussions.</p>

<p>You can always attend a larger university for grad school, should that be something you’re considering. The great thing about LACs is that they are really geared towards their undergraduates and place emphasis on those programs.</p>

<p>SmySmy- I know where you’re coming from. I could stay here, but it would feel like I was just settling for this college experience. Definitely try to choose a school where you feel can thrive- somewhere where you will feel comfortable enough to take risks and grow intellectually and personally. That sounds cheesy, but I think it is true.
and englishivy makes a good point as well.</p>