<p>Some background: I've been solely studying for the US History SAT for the past week. I began with Barron's, but found it too comprehensive for quick studying. So I switched over to Sparknotes, and some daily review of the notes, I went from a 570 (heinous) on my first practice test to a 740 on my third. </p>
<p>There is obviously some variability, but since my main gaps in knowledge concerned Pre-1800s material, a thorough perusal of those topics quickly brought my scores up.</p>
<p>Anyways, I haven't done anything with Lit since a Barron's test I did about a month ago. I received a 740 without any preparation, which actually worries me more than it relieves me, as I have ALWAYS had problems with Barron's and generally score in the mid 500s and low 600s. I could have just gotten lucky, but the test in general seemed ridiculously easy.</p>
<p>I just did Collegeboard's practice questions, which are said to be more indicative of the type of questions on the test. I found them to be even easier and got all of them correct. </p>
<p>This might reassure some of you, but as someone who is historically bad at standardized testing, this is seriously worrying me. I don't know if I'm just getting lucky, or if I can actually handle the test. There isn't enough time to take more practice tests -- perhaps just one more from Barron's -- and I really want to focus on US History.</p>
<p>What do you think? Advice?</p>