<p>Up
The Hangover
Star Trek</p>
<p>Up is ranked pretty high on IMDB. It seems pretty fun, maybe I should go see it.</p>
<p>I still need to get around to watching Wall-E and Ratatouille.</p>
<p>And Slumdog Millionaire.</p>
<p>And The Dark Knight.</p>
<p>Slumdog Millionaire 7.5/10 (I would rate this higher, but I had really REALLY high expectations for this movie)
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind 9/10
Love Actually 8/10 (total feel-good movie)</p>
<p>I saw Up last week. Definitely recommend it. 9.5/10</p>
<ol>
<li>Pride and Glory</li>
<li>The Secret Life of Bees</li>
<li>Marley and Me</li>
</ol>
<p>my mom just recently bought movies :)</p>
<p>“Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind 9/10” </p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Seriously? Up is an 11/10</p>
<p>Uhh…
The Producers (1968 w/ Gene Wilder)
Pulp Fiction
The Hangover (funniest movie so far this year)</p>
<p>Why did “Clockwork Orange” get a 6? I thought that movie was good. Anyways…
Miss March
Observe and Report
I love you man</p>
<p>
A 6/10 is good. It’s over half…</p>
<p>I just didn’t enjoy A Clockwork Orange much. Didn’t find it engaging, and I couldn’t really relate to it. Most importantly, I didn’t really extract any fundamental epiphany from it, which is usually how I measure a movie’s greatness.</p>
<p>Iron Man (5/10)
Fatal Attraction (6/10)
Dr Strangelove (2/10)
The Shawshank Redemption (10/10)</p>
<p>the book a clockwork orange was WAY better than the movie. i completely agree yawn, it did not make you really think. it was just visually enjoyable more than anything.</p>
<p>dr strangelove is WEIRD. i can see how it would be hilarious 40 years ago. but it just seemed sooooo ssslllloooowwww</p>
<p>
I totally agree. Wasn’t the guy riding the nuke… bizarre?</p>
<p>*The Shawshank Redemption (10/10) *</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Fast and Furious
Transformers
Fireproof</p>
<p>Doubt
The Hangover
Art School Confidential</p>
<p>About to watch Monty Python’s Meaning of Life in a few minutes, which is my favorite movie ever.</p>
<p>Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants
Notebook</p>
<p>My D is sick.</p>
<p>Up (8.5/10)
Casino Royale (5.5/10)
The Girl Who Leapt Through Time (7.0/10)
Catch Me if You Can (6.5/10)</p>
<p>Bow before the might of my double sigfigs!</p>
<p>“Art School Confidential”</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>The whole rating system of movies is so arbitrary. Some people may give movies higher scores than they deserve, or vice versa. </p>
<p>Roger Ebert, can you visit this silly little CC thread, plz?</p>
<p>Haha, all value judgments are arbitrary, their quantification doubly so. </p>
<p>I’d say that giving a numeric rating can help usefully distinguish between a single person’s preferences within a homogeneous genre (which I totally violated. I have different standards for, say, comedies, compared to, oh, horror movies. So my ratings could either reflect a) an implicit bias towards one genre over another or b) my appraisal of the quality of the movies themselves), or, when taken *en masse<a href=“through%20metacritic%20and%20rottentomatoes%20and%20the%20like”>/I</a>, slightly less usefully determine a given society’s movie preferences (assuming that popular reviewers are popular because their opinions coincide with those of their readers. I suppose that net gross could also serve in this capacity, though with modern marketing not so much. And popular opinion polls, too, but those suffer from their fair share of problems also).</p>