I concur with demo. Montauk is out of date.
With the significant drop in applications, and high scores, 17x, law schools are scrambling to keep their medians. At best, a major will count as a tie breaker. Going in, the only thing Penn cares about for the unhooked is GPA+LSAT. A 3.8 Comm major will beat a 3.5 most-rigorous-major nearly every time.
But in reality the quote below is plain bogus, and insults our intelligence.
Penn, like every LS, has a strict curve. There will always be someone at the bottom of the class. By definition. Sure, it might help Penn if that bottom decile were STEM PhD’s and thus (perhaps) marketable even with low grades.
(Coming out, job placement is about the only thing Penn cares about.)
And to UVa, Accounting majors are (already) marketable. Again, it can be plus to the LS to accept some; if, as UVa infers, Accounting majors will struggle, they will end up on the bottom half the class. But that is ok, since they have a much better shot at a job than rigorous-non-STEM major in the bottom half of the class. Accounting majors may gravitate to Tax, which is also marketable. For the LS, Win-Win.
Heck, even if those vocational majors struggle and drop out after 1L, it’s still a Win for the top LS, who will just fill that slot with a full-payor for 2 years. (Given the drop in top scores, merit aid has increased exponentially over the past few years. So, a law school is more than happy to accept a few extra full pay transfers to offset the increased merit money.)