Leadership - and the hunt for scholarships

"Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it. "–Dwight Eisenhower

Kind of a traditional definition, that applies pretty broadly in the work world - for good leadership, anyway.

What I am trying to understand is how it is defined from a Scholarship perspective. I don’t know how many scholarships I’ve looked at that list “Leadership” as a primary factor. What does that really mean for a kid?

Being president of a club can have more to do with popularity than with leadership, particularly in High School. And, what about a student who doesn’t desire that type of position - the clear “leader” positions. There are so many ways a student may “lead,” but identifying those and then conveying it, can be quite difficult. So a kid who keeps the school website updated, or works on a team to develop props for a competition and guides the team to select their idea - would both be “leadership,” though not traditional, at least in my mind.

Here is what typical scholarships say:

Vanderbilt: students who combine outstanding academic achievement with strong leadership and contributions outside the classroom.

Georgia Tech: those who demonstrate extraordinary academic achievement, outstanding leadership skills, and have high potential to contribute inside and outside the classroom at Georgia Tech.

So how do you define it and what did your child do to show it? What is really meant when a scholarship says, “awards are based on showing strong/outstanding leadership?”

It’s a fudge factor to reward kids who may not be at the top of the pile in terms of stats but who have something else distinctive/tremendous about their application.

Eagle Scout who turned a vacant lot into a playground accessible to kids in wheelchairs. Church volunteer who persuaded a group of adults to sponsor a Syrian refugee family (and took a leading role in making that happen). Ordinary kid who got their county’s transportation department to add an early bus from a local subsidized housing complex to a suburban industrial park which allowed a lot of unemployed people with no cars to actually get good jobs.

These are the kind of things which are not Intel-worthy or Physics Olympiad or “AP Scholar with Distinction” worthy. In some communities, the kid wouldn’t even get “recognition” at awards night because it didn’t involve a varsity sport or a school sponsored activity. And these might be kids who their classmates know nothing about- the quiet girl in the last row in Spanish, or the nerdy kid in homeroom. But they are evidence of the kind of skills and temperament and character that suggest that the kid would be a phenomenal addition to a campus even if the kid isn’t president of this and winning gold cords and stacks of trophies at an awards banquet.