Legalization of Recreational Drugs

<p>I lost my father to Cocaine and Heroine in the 80's. I realize how detrimental it was to himself, my family and others around him. Even though he messed up, it was his choice and he chose to destroy his life. I feel no sympathy to somebody who chooses to do drugs and screws up there life. If somebody chooses to have unprotected sex and gets HIV, they deserve it. </p>

<p>Its all about choice. I feel that the individual will make the best decisions for themselves at all times, and a government cannot make the best decisions for a person. So I am for the complete legalization of all drugs without any limitations. I see no need for pharmacies and pharmacists, when people can make the decisions for themselves. if they make a uneducated decision, they deserve the consequences. A new standard of human intelligence will then be introduced.</p>

<p>I am still for a government protecting peoples freedoms from other people. So if somebody on cocaine was to drive into a another car, they would be charged. If you infringe on anothers freedoms then thats illegal. But if you are doing Crack in your living room, what do I care. </p>

<p>Also Xanax is not a opiate its a Benzo,</p>

<p>I think that anyone who has the decency to post an idiotic post such as this should be ashamed of themselves. It looks to me like you are a drug attic and dont care what happens to people or children out there who would be getting hurt or killed by taking these drugs had they been legalized. That makes you a heartless, stupid, person and you have no business stating your opinion on te matter.</p>

<p>By the way the message I posted above was directed at the idiot who started this post not at the others who are commenting on it.</p>

<p>I agree with you about it being choice but what you fail to realize is there are children out there not knowing what they are doing to their lives and some of these children have piece of **** parents who dont care enough for their kids to teach them right from wrong. There are parents out there practically giving kids drugs and teaching them that its good. Dont say that thosekids deserve that. There is a difference between adults who know better and children who dont know better and who dont have a choice.</p>

<p>…I’m pretty sure that using any method of drug legalization would involve age limits. No one is proposing that children should be able to walk into a store and buy heroin. </p>

<p>I would wholeheartedly be for legalization of all drugs for those over 21, as a drug user who is under 21. As it stands, it is easier for most kids to get marijuana or any other drug than alcohol. Drug dealers don’t have age limits. Yes you would have some underage use, like underage drinking. Think about where underage drinking happens though - high schools and colleges, places where drugs are currently readily available. So it wouldn’t be all that different in those places. But legalization would crack down on young children doing drugs, which I think everyone can agree is not a good thing. </p>

<p>Furthermore, if you don’t do drugs, it’s not for the sole reason that they are illegal. If someone wants to do drugs, they won’t be stopped by them being illegal. So people wouldn’t start doing drugs because drugs were legalized. If heroin was legalized tomorrow, would you do it? No. I wouldn’t either and neither would most of the population. If someone would, they would be doing it already so it being illegal really won’t stop them. Maybe you might smoke weed if it was legalized, maybe more people would do that (but probably not many), but that doesn’t really hurt you. People don’t want to do drugs that can really hurt them for the most part and if they do they’re going to regardless.</p>

<p>It would also take the criminality out of drug sales - no more drug dealers because it would all be legal. No more violent ghettos fueled by drugs. Are there such things as sketchy alcohol pushers? No. It would be purchased legitimately. It could be taxed giving insane profits to the country. The violent drug cartels in Mexico would disappear. The drug industries would not be huge violent gang-run schemes, but legal industries just like the alcohol industry. Drugs would be purer, which would make them safer (if that doesn’t make sense, when you take a pill you would know what was in it, whereas on the street it could be mixed with a variety of bad things). </p>

<p>People actually also don’t want to hurt themselves, even drug users. If drugs were legalized we would probably see more people using milder versions of drugs. For example, when Prohibition was lifted there was less drinking of liquor and more drinking of beer and wine, which is safer. In that same vein, we would likely see more people smoking opium instead of shooting heroin, or chewing coca leaves instead of smoking crack.</p>

<p>It’s a little pointless though because all drugs will never be legalized. However, you really only get the full benefits if ALL drugs are legalized, because if something is illegal it causes violence and gangs making profits from it, and also there’s no regulation which makes it even more dangerous. If we were truly committed to personal freedom as well as protection of the individual, we would legalize all drugs. But if the US legalized drugs there would still be a lot of smuggling problems (although lots of money from drug tourism!) and across-the-border crime, so the only real way everything would be fixed is if ALL countries legalized all drugs.</p>

<p>yes. People should have the right to consume any drug. The “war” on drugs has failed and always will. Billions of dollars are wasted every year on imprisoning non-violent drug related offenders. Why is an alcohol addict treated as diseased and a cocaine addict treated like a criminal? Why are politicians throwing people in prison for drugs when the pharmaceutical companies are selling amphetamines, marinol, opiates.</p>

<p>[Study</a> Finds Alcohol and Tobacco More Harmful than Marijuana, LSD, or Ecstasy–Drug Reclassification Should Follow : The Scientific Activist](<a href=“http://scienceblogs.com/scientificactivist/2006/08/study_finds_alcohol_and_tobacc.php]Study”>http://scienceblogs.com/scientificactivist/2006/08/study_finds_alcohol_and_tobacc.php)</p>

<p>According to this article (any many others like it), many Class A drugs are less harmful than legalized alcohol. Accordingly, it seems to make sense to legalize Mary Jane, ecstasy, etc. – Anything with less physical/mental harm than alcohol should be legalized.</p>

<p>Happy People + Government Spending Cuts = Logic without moral implications, and I am perfectly OK with that.</p>

<p>Marijuana? HELL YEAH.
Heroin? No ****ing way.</p>

<p>Okay to start off, I agree marijuana should be legalized. There are many arguments for it, and locking up people for it is quite ridiculous. But everyone says that once it is legalized, everything will be happy and good, there may be an initial “overdose period” or whatever, but eventually it will level out. I’m curious, how do we know that this won’t turn into some mitigated form of what happened to China during the Opium Wars (bear in mind that I know opium is more powerful/addicting than marijuana, hence the use of the word “mitigated”)?</p>

<p>I think these days we’re more informed about the effects of drugs and how to deal with them appropriately than in the days of China’s opium wars, and I think were drugs to be legalized, they should be put under strict controls (stricter than alcohol, maybe you could only buy them from a government-run store if you were over a certain age and could only buy certain amounts, maybe you’d even have to get a permit). </p>

<p>I don’t think legalization of marijuana alone would cause any severe damage…people who want to smoke weed now will smoke weed. Its illegality isn’t preventing anyone from smoking. Therefore, very few people will smoke weed simply because it is legal (or if they do that will only last until it’s not a new thing anymore).</p>