<p>I agree with Rage. Why are you so proud of this?</p>
<p>He is not a nerd. A nerd wouldnt be proud of such.</p>
<p>Hes a dweeb.</p>
<p>are you sure these stuffs are all true?
I wouldnt call myself a nerd. I wouldnt call any of my friends a nerd. And if that's your definition of a nerd, I wouldnn't call any of the nerd's in our school a nerd. That 'nediness' is too..extreme..</p>
<p>Listen up geeks, and hear well, because, I am not THE KING OF NERDERS anymore.</p>
<p>I've been accepted into UCB's EECS program o_o. </p>
<p>The fundamental rule of pure nerder-ness is that you must be an utmost failiure in comparison to your geek/nerder peers. I'm not an utmost failiure.</p>
<p>It looks like now someone can pick up the torch and carry on the title KING OF NERDERS. </p>
<p>I AM NOT THE KING OF NERDERS.</p>
<p>interesting OP.</p>
<p>Hello 2005 people.</p>
<p>Necrophilia is not respectful to the dead and buried alive.</p>
<p>lol i just noticed the dates. can’t stop rofl-ing at this thread. and i sure love the tags.</p>
<p>So he’s ugly and has a lot of video games. That doesn’t make him the biggest nerd here by any means.</p>
<p>Nerds aren’t geeks. Nerds are like geeks but gross and creepy.</p>
<p>^really? wow all this time i thought the opposite.</p>
<p>yeah, it’s the opposite. desi_chick is right</p>
<p>Ex.</p>
<p>Lisa = Nerd
Milhouse = geek</p>
<p>Can we just label OP and everyone who challenged him with that all-encompassing descriptor “loser” and leave? :|</p>