<p><a href="http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/%5B/url%5D">http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/</a></p>
<p>TowerTopView,</p>
<p>Why do you persist in posting that same weird link over and over in different threads? It’s nearly impossible to make any sense of that blog post, so it seems like a trollish thing to keep posting. In any event, Stanford enjoys a well-deserved reputation for having an extraordinarily safe campus. Clery Act stats show here’s almost no violent crime at Stanford; in fact the only unlawful activity there seems to be bike theft.</p>
<p>zenkoan,</p>
<p>The link is not weird, what’s happening in the case is really weird. If you could not make sense, some else would.</p>
<p>Stanford did have a good reputation for campus safety, but what’s happening in this case is criminal and a reality. There is a police case number here with real names and real time and real place, how could this be unreal? can you deny anything I said in my blog? how could such crimes be tolerated in a University? how could such simple case not be clarified for over five years? Someone from Stanford once told me that that’s because the suspect is a susper woman while I am a mortal man, but I don’t see that’s a valid reason why her crimes should be covered up. That’s what you should call weird. </p>
<p>This case had induced follow up retaliation on me for almost six years without an end, because it was treated with extreme unfairness and egregious miscarriage of justice. If it could happen to me, it could happen to anyone who’s coming to Stanford University. I post it to public to pressue those who’s mishandling this case to be responsible. The powers behind the suspect side not only pick on me, but also had enough power to counter Stanford. I am not against Stanford; those who’s committing crimes are actually huminilating the name of Stanford. I post it here to help Stanford people fight against crimes from the inside of Stanford. </p>
<p>I keep posting this case in an effort to bring the justice back. Of course, if there is a real improvement of my situation, I’d be glad to stop posting it.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>I checked out that link too, but I couldn’t make heads or tails of it. It’s incomprehensible.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Then why don’t you leave it like a mystery to you. If you couldn’t understand my words, I bet you could still understand photos.</p>
<p>follow the links in the top letter would be easier to understand
<a href=“http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!272.entry[/url]”>http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!272.entry</a></p>
<p>Well, the case makes enough sense in that you claim to have been assaulted by a Stanford student who then proceeded to use her “connections” to incriminate you. If this is true, as the photos would suggest, I would find it a rather troubling matter, but the fact of the matter is, we are prospective or soon-to-be matriculating students. As we are outsiders to this environment, we do not have the power to aid your cause. You would claim to post this in order to publicize some of the skeletons in Stanford’s closet and that makes enough sense. Nevertheless, posting the blog link over and over again is not really all that necessary, especially considering how slowly the Stanford board moves.</p>
<p>I337toast</p>
<h1>Well, the case makes enough … Stanford board moves.</h1>
<p>She is not a Stanford student. She’s a contractor, same as me, when we work under the same boss at that time. I never knew her before and never met her thereafter. This case is well know among all Stanford administrators. The weird thing is how such a simple case could not be clarified for almost six years in Stanford. I am being [further</a> victimized](<a href=“http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!269.entry]further”>http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!269.entry) under such hazy situation. </p>
<p>It is not only my personal issue, it’s also an issue of crimes and safety of Stanford community. At least, this case could tell that Stanford campus is not as safe as the statistics said, as zenkoan indicated above. It regards to the fairness, dignity and credibility of Stanford University. I believe anyone related to Stanford would care about the fair handling of this case: You don’t want anyone in this university to assist an assailant suspect lady to retaliate and threaten the victim. And I also believe there would be all kinds of people come here to notice this case.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>The atrocity part is not the main focus of this case. [What’s</a> happening thereafter are real problems needs to be tackled.](<a href=“http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!271.entry]What’s”>http://stanfordwakes.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D9C656ED20BAD722!271.entry)</p>
<p>“ZZZ is the origin of the injustices in this case. ZZZ is a powerful officer in the legal system, who hided in the darkness and abused the legal power vested in him/her to assist the suspect lady to retaliate on the victim(me), as well as to assist the suspect to counter Stanford authorities for many years. ZZZ not only picks on me, but also picks on Stanford. Stanford people must know who ZZZ is.”</p>
<p>I want you to take a step back and look at what you are asking us to believe. It seems like you are trying to convince us that there is some powerful government official hiding in the shadows who is helping a criminal frame you and manipulating the Stanford administration, and you don’t offer any independent sources. These are some heavy accusations and it is going to take some pretty hardcore evidence to convince us.</p>
<p>Also, I find it almost impossible to believe that someone in the government can illegally manipulate Stanford. Here is why. You argue that ZZZ is a powerful officer in the legal system. I can not conceive of any position in the legal system that would give someone the power to manipulate Stanford. Bear in mind that Stanford has one of the best law schools in the nation, and that law school acts as their attorney in many cases.</p>
<p>Lets got through positions in the government that have significant legal power. Federal judge, district attorney, supreme court justice, and attorney general. Let’s go through and see how none of these people could manipulate Stanford. Federal judge, judges can not level charges against institutions, they need to wait for a case to be brought to them, and anyways, trials are done by jury in many cases and there are appeals courts, so even if a judged held a current case over their head they could just let it fall through and go after the appeal.</p>
<p>A supreme court justice could not do it, he is only one of nine, and I don’t think Stanford frequently goes before the supreme court.</p>
<p>The attorney general could not blackmail Stanford because of Stanford’s law school. The attorney general only has the power to determine who the federal government prosecutes. So even if the attorney general went after Stanford, I’m sure they could easily defeat any baseless claim, unless Stanford has a skeleton in its closet.</p>
<p>The only government official who would have any ability to manipulate Stanford would be a high ranking DOD official. Stanford receives a boat load of money from the DOD for research. But I really doubt this. Also, a DOD official would not have a ton of pull in the legal system. The only person who has pull at both the DOD and in the legal system is the president, and if you want to argue that the president is screwing up your life, I really don’t know what to say.</p>
<p>I can’t believe I typed this up, but you seemed to be getting angry when people don’t agree with you. I just want you to understand why we are skeptical. You are not showing us any independent sources, and you are pushing some extreme theories. Right now, even if what you say is true, you are coming off as just another internet conspiracy theorist. You need to back yourself up.</p>
<p>OK, I’d be glad to take a step back. I’d leave ZZZ alone as long as ZZZ would not molest me in the future. I wish ZZZ would feel regret when he/she remember that he/she had molested me as a victim for almost six years in a violent campus atrocity case according to the suspect’s wish. May ZZZ not exist. May ZZZ be gone with the wind …</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Whoever ZZZ is, if he/she did exist, I’d challenge him/her to confront me at legal system authorities to clarify this case. That’s important for the fair handling of this case by either Stanford or government authorities, as well as for saving the damage of the reputation of Stanford University out of this case. I am not a internet conspiracy theorist. I am a victim of multiple crimes and I am responsible for whatever I posted on the web. </p>
<p>I emphasize again that ‘confrontation’ is the key to solve this case, which the suspect side are afraid of and try their best to avoid, though I challenged them all the time.</p>
<p>Again, may ZZZ not exist. May ZZZ be gone with the wind.</p>
<p>Are you just posting this link to try to make less people apply?</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>I am sorry if you think of it in that way. Stanford is great, I wish more and more people apply.</p>
<p>As I said in the reply to zenkoan, I post it here to help Stanford people fight against crimes from the inside of Stanford. If it could happen to me, it could happen to anyone who’s coming to Stanford. If it was hided from the public, similar situation would happen again and again. </p>
<p>Everyone who’s coming to Stanford wants to have a safe and fair and justice environment. It’s not only for my personal interest, but also for the safety and fairness regarding to anyone in Stanford University.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>I read most of the blog you linked to, and this is basically what I got out of it: you came to Stanford to help with a project; a slightly crazy, slightly xenophobic student harassed you; you reported her; since she hadn’t really done much, legally, she was not convicted; she accused you of sexual assault. That is being fairly generous, and assuming that you truly had absolutely no part in escalating this. Then, from what you said in the blog, you deduced that there is some shadowy governmental figure who is terrorizing you from afar. And, somehow, this is all Stanford’s fault, for not releasing this shadowy figure’s identity.</p>
<p>I have to say, I do feel bad for you. You may have actually been treated unfairly. But there are a few problems here: her assault on you happened a long time ago (so long ago that it can no longer be prosecuted), it wasn’t that severe in the first place (the pictures you posted are really just scrapes and bruises… nothing that the police really need to get involved in), and you are incredibly paranoid (your rationale for the existence of ZZZ doesn’t make any sense). I’m sorry, and I hope you don’t take this the wrong way, but I would honestly recommend that you seek some counseling (maybe in your native language?).</p>
<p>Starmie, where did you get your education? you need glasses and some honesty to yourself.
answer to you more soon …</p>
<p>Starmie,</p>
<p>A well educated lady with normal mental health would not abuse office name bar, nor would she beat another person to that shape. Her kicks are very heavy which almost got me down on the floor several times. One of her heaviest kicks had left permanent scar on my leg. She was not convicted because I did her a great favor by not insisting pressing charge on her, and that the case was not sent to DA by police for review in time. I can’t imagine a police officer (would you tell me his/her name?) would say such campus atrocity is ignorable. If there is a statue time of limit, how come she could came back and falsely charged me for ‘sexual assault’ after statue time of limit?</p>
<p>ZZZ does exist and functioned to assist the suspect counter Stanford authorities while retaliate on me [Reference 7]. That’s why this suspect lady’s curse could overrule resolutions from Stanford authorities these many years. ZZZ is just a bit too shy to confront me because he/she felt guilty of what he/she had done to me. I’d ignore ZZZ. But now ZZZ dare not even acknowledge his/her own existence, tragic indeed. I didn’t say it’s all Stanford’s fault, that’s your words, not mine. How can you deny ZZZ’s existence? Come to me and I’ll tell you how. </p>
<p>Yes, the assault case had past for six years. But what’s far more problematic and crime related are in the retaliation part which were logged in [reference 4] and [reference 6] in my poster. Also how come this case still could not be clarified in Stanford after six years? what’s going on here? At least someone responsible from authorities has the responsibility to explain to me or to the public.</p>
<p>if you had guts, show me your true identity, let me show you what I have and let’s clarify our points at police, otherwise, please shut up.</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p>That’s not true. The case never went through the legal process. That’s because I didn’t insist pressing charge on her, and also police didn’t send the file to DA for a review in time. Police told me that’s serious crime and I could press charge, but also suggested me to leave it behind and go on with life. I took the later advise in favor of this suspect lady. It is her false charge and the power behind her that made her far more guilty than physical assault. I used to insist bringing her to justice because I do have unselfish reason to say so, which I would tell later.</p>