<p>^^ Cathbomb</p>
<p>don’t tell me I misread another question… I thought it asked</p>
<p>For which of the sequences is the sum of the three numbers the same as the middle number multiplied by itself?</p>
<p>@lanayru but was it this 20 minute section or one of the 25 minute sections?</p>
<p>math jan curve was NOT generous </p>
<p>-1 was 760</p>
<p>It was 2,3,4, because if you add those up you get 9. 3 squared is 9.</p>
<p>it was 15. and</p>
<p>@zzzzzz1027, why did you square it? sorry, i just cant remember everything about the picture) and I thought it should have been multipled by 12 not 9 because there were 12 shaded rectangles?</p>
<p>2,3,4
2+3+4 = 3^2</p>
<p>@stressedouttt oh… do you remember the question exactly? I think maybe I read it wrong</p>
<p>Wow, the math curve in January was that bad? That’s surprising…hm. Well, then I expect the March curve will be better than the January curve.</p>
<p>“For which of the sequences is the sum of the three numbers the same as the middle number multiplied by itself?”</p>
<p>yeah that was the question</p>
<p>The March curve should be better (I did not score where I wanted to with the Jan test)… I’m at -0 right now, so the curve doesn’t matter to me… yet :P</p>
<p>I think this curve is a simple -1 = 780</p>
<p>The answer was 2,3,4 and the line was 5.5. I checked these multiple times during the section.</p>
<p>ah. okay.
@jimmypod you didn’t misread the question… I did. :P</p>
<p>@Galinda</p>
<p>Yeah I don’t think there has been another instance where -1 resulted in a 760.</p>
<p>Or at least not that I can remember.</p>
<p>On another note…
I’m so skeptical about the math section. Theoretically it’s supposed to be pretty damn easy math. However, a simple misread of a question can lead to an incorrect answer. AND THIS HAPPENS OFTEN. People misread questions ALL the time. How does the SAT even think that it can measure mathematical ability? ACT Math for the win.</p>
<p>does anyone know if the one with the 6p factors was experimental?</p>
<p>@dragon33r1
I subtracted the areas of the 9 unshaded squares from the area of the big square. We did it differently…</p>
<p>^doesn’t look like it. everyone seems to have had the 6p one</p>
<p>@galinda</p>
<p>The January curve: -1 760
Yeah terrible. This should be more generous I would hope. It almost couldn’t get harsher than January. probably 770-780</p>
<p>6p factors were NOT experimental. I got experi CR and the question. Sorry :(</p>
<p>Look at this guys</p>
<p>[SAT</a> Curves](<a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf]SAT”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf)</p>
<p>Only the EASIEST test have curves of -1 = 770 and 780.
Usually a -1 (on a medium test) results in a 780 or a 790.
The tougher tests even give straight up 800s.</p>
<h2>6p factors were NOT experimental. I got experi CR and the question. Sorry</h2>
<p>crap, sheet. I think that was the only one i got wrong (hopefully). Man I forgot to consider 2 and 3p and only considered 3 and 2p</p>
<p>@zzzzzz1027</p>
<p>ohhh, I see but did it ask for the unshaded region or am I mistaken?</p>