<p>the last paragraph of the insect scientists in Surinam, it was problematic</p>
<p>Ugh I hope so. I’m aiming for at least a 2100 as this was my first real sat. </p>
<p>I didn’t get to 3 of the hard problems in math but there were none of the questions i answered that i had doubts about. So my math is looking pretty strong.
If i had 2 write-in math sections, does that make one experimental?</p>
<p>Could someone post the answers to the short paired passages on happiness?
I thought those 4 questions were tricky, considering the nuances between the attitudes of the two authors were kinda subtle.
Thanks in advance!</p>
<p>@dragooner4 I agree. It was definitely problematic.</p>
<p>I remember a question on the grammar section where few was underlined. Was it incorrect. I thought it was suppose to be "less. Anyone remember?</p>
<p>satanonymous:
</p>
<p>I’d disagree:</p>
<p>-I put that it demonstrated a challenge (improving the observation platform’s design layout isn’t relevant at all to the passage).
-How was it a digression? The author was conveying the sense of the moon’s uniformity.</p>
<p>In the Jungle CR section, when it talks about the “great” men of Amsterdam. Great is best substituted for what word? I only remember “zealous” for one of the options but I don’t think that’s what I filled in, I’m not sure.</p>
<p>Dimmesdale: I put eminent.</p>
<p>yesss that’s what I put too… without knowing what it meant haha, POE. Hopefully that’s right.</p>
<p>On the Math Section, there was a question that had a Venn Diagram and it asked to calculate the shaded region. The subject had something to do with students taking different language classes? I don’t know but regardless I put Twenty as the answer. Anyone get that?</p>
<p>Dimmesdale: that may have been experimental.</p>
<p>i dont remember the question exactly but it was about the 3 spiders with different characteristics and some of the answers choices were like the natives told her, the scientists knew,she found out from observation etc idk i dont really remember does anyone know what im talking about?</p>
<p>@RMID Yeah, I recognize my mistakes 
For both of them I was switching between the choices I picked and the ones we decided are most likely right. So bummed :/</p>
<p>Does anyone know which section was the CR experimental?
I had 4 sections, so I thought the music one might have been it but obviously everyone else had that too…</p>
<p>I had experimental CR, got the Helen Keller passage.
I’m almost 100% that it was experimental cause nobody else in my testing room got that passage…</p>
<p>and yeah, classical music section was hard.
I looked over the answers and I was so happy that I got all the answers for the other two sections right and then i read the classical music answers… enh.</p>
<p>satacer2400: You’re talking about the butterfly question, right? I got, I forgot the exact wording, but something along the lines of “scientists discovered it at a later time” because the passage said that it was "something that (whatever her name was) would never know, and also said that it was something “nobody would know about for a long long time”.</p>
<p>Helen Keller was the experimental passage. I did not have an extra reading and so I did not have Helen Keller</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yeah, about that question; is it definitely that scientists would not discover it for a long time? The answer choice seems correct, even if there’s a very slight/self evident leap in logic that scientists would discover it (unless if it actually said that…IDR).</p>
<p>I thought it was a matter of best answer - all the other answer choices didn’t convey the two sentences i quoted from the passage. I’m not sure if I’m correct though, anyone else have an input?</p>
<p>Hey guys lets work on the critical reading vocab for the last section that had happiness and classical section! I remember one question was about a rock climber… Does anyone remember the last vocab q in that section? It was number 8</p>