<p>I put .3 </p>
<p>Answer must be between 1/3 and 1/5
@doctator</p>
<p>Does anyone remember a grid-in that asked for a possible value of y^n? </p>
<p>It was the second to last grid-in BUT I had 2 grid in sections, and I’m hoping it was experimental. </p>
<p>@ScrewCC I didn’t have that so it’s experimental. </p>
<p>@Hawkace</p>
<p>If the woman was at home, they would still be on record in that area as buying things/working,etc; he had a collection of the documents from daily life their and since she stayed she would have some sort of trace.</p>
<p>And for the telephone one, I have come across a similar one on a past practice test; I said “when it was introduced, it revolutionized communication” because both events occurred at the same time. It is akin to saying “when she won the noble prize, she became the first woman to do so” - both events occur in the same time period (a.k.a one caused the other), so you do not use the past perfect and rather the simple past.</p>
<p>Or at least I think, I am fairly certain about the first one though.</p>
<p>You might be right about the first one but I’m fairly certain that I’m right about the second one. @foolish</p>
<p>@foolish women had fewer rights back then so there probably weren’t good records of women purchasing stuff ???</p>
<p>Do you happen to have the actual question? I didn’t come across it in the Google docs but those things are messes at this point :P</p>
<p>I was considering using had but I really think using had would imply some past action occurring after it - the only other action in a different timeframe occurred afterwards in the present tense.</p>
<p>@SavedTatWhim</p>
<p>Lol, I don’t think they discriminated with purchasing records. Either way, that would require too much insight and SAT Reading is always straight from the passage.</p>
<p>@foolish We will have to wait and see. </p>
<p>Was this test’s math a little harder? Can 1 wrong still be a 800?</p>
<p>has anyone talked about the story from Galileo and simplifico was talking about the moon and stuff…was this experimental?</p>
<p>@Hawkace “When it was first introduced, it has revolutionized communications” </p>
<p>For this sentence I’m not following how it’s “had” for a couple reasons. For one thing, in spanish that tense is never used when one thing happens at the same time as another. Idk what language you take in high school or what you’re basing your assumption on but that would be like the difference between imperfect/ preterite or past. </p>
<p>Second, if we use other sentences with that same reasoning, they all sound awkward. It only doesn’t sound awkward if we’re trying to say the two things happened at different times. Here:</p>
<p>“We had taken a walk when the sun came up.”
“We took a walk when the sun came up.”</p>
<p>Number #2 is correct, or more correct, and the only thing I did was swing the adv clause to the end of the sentence.</p>
<p>“We ate before they came home.”
“We had eaten before they came home.”</p>
<p>In this case, yes, the past perfect is correct, because the first event preceded the next.</p>
<p>Does this make sense? I know it might be explained weirdly but I learned more about tenses from spanish class than english class :-j </p>
<p>Yeah what’s the curve like? I don’t think math was hard enough for a -1 curve, sorry. Im guessing writing and math will be like the usual. You think 4 wrong CR could get me 770?</p>
<p>Math is rarely -1 800. But maybe, 25% chance maybe, it will be.</p>
<p>collegepanda says 25% lol</p>
<p>How many wrong for like a 750 in CR you think? As of now i’ve only made 1 mistake, but im guessing that I made more since Im stupid</p>
<p>Probably 3-4.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the Math question on the MC section that was like P/R > 1?
If so, just confirming, it was GREATER THAN 1 and not LESS THAN right?</p>
<p>@tasteslikebutter
I take Spanish as well. There was not a option where it was “has”.
It’s either “revolutionized communications” “they had revolutionized communications”.
Get what I am saying?
Pay phones were plural so it as “had”. </p>
<p>@foolish</p>
<p>100% sure the answer is r < p < 0</p>
<p>Because it couldve been -2/-1 and yes it would be p/r > 1 </p>
<p>@foolish I think that is correct. I got p > r > 0 (because -2/-1 > 1).</p>