<p>Ok. Let me look at this from a different angle just using quotes. </p>
<p>“Smell Receptors in the nose respond to the vibration of molecules after docking” was exactly what Turin believed. </p>
<p>The quote: “Some receptors would actually feel the molecules buzz” sounds exactly like Turin’s theory. It’s in Turin’s words! </p>
<p>While implausible, Turin’s proposal is certainly a delightful potpourri of creativity, conjecture, extrapolation, and isolated observations.</p>
<p>Hmm, Turin’s proposal is implausible? Wait does that mean the quote is implausible since it’s the exact same?</p>
<p>Hey guys quick question the passage about the soup stone was that experimental or no? SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER ME…</p>
<p>@LovaA2Trig the answer to that was 16pi/9 convert 80 degrees to radians which its 4pi/9 multiply by the radius 4 u get 16pi/9</p>
<p>@foolish</p>
<p>I don’t recall P2 rejecting the theory of buzzing molecules in receptors, but I do remember the last sentence explicitly criticizing Turin only for his “subjective” approach of picking out scents. Which is what that other scientist was doing when he formulated his theory. Even IF P2 rejected the buzzing of molecules theory, choice C would STILL make the most sense.</p>
<p>It was not experimental</p>
<p>Can someone please tell me if the soup stone passage was experimental or not… @foolish @MyRealName …</p>
<p>@ThemasterOG There aren’t certain passages that are experimental and non-experimental. If a passage is in a non-experimental section, then the whole section is not experimental.</p>
<p>Yes but @MovingtoTexas all P2 ever mentioned was that the theory is “implausible”, it did not go into explicit detail about why he thinks so. The closing point of his passage was that Turin was way over his head in trying to formulate the theory by reacting to his own sense of smell, thereby making the theory implausible. As a matter of fact, I don’t even think the author of P2 mentioned any of his opinions whatsoever on the buzzing theory itself by providing analysis/data. If he did though, let me know.</p>
<p>For the olfactory impression question was “influences” one of the answer choices?</p>
<p>Crud, I thought I got an 800 in reading. I guess I got two wrong for sure, just by reading this.
“Insured” vs. “ensured”; darn, I chose “give everyone a seat” because of a weird comparison, I guess.</p>
<p>insured ensured is writing section lol</p>
<p>Do you get the same score as omitting only one question and getting only one question wrong? assuming all the other questions are correct</p>
<p>The Question was in Math and it had 2 circles that shared the same radius. One circle was larger than the other and the ratio that the radius takes up in regards to the circle was 2:1 It asked to find the ratio between the area of the larger circle to the smaller one. Experimental? Can someone confirm it for me pleasee :/</p>
<p>does anyone know the answer choice or what the answer was for the match problem that said…</p>
<p>P/R>1 for intigers P and R.</p>
<p>and then it gave choices like this, but idk if these were the exact answers given</p>
<p>P<0<R
R<P<0
0<P<R</p>
<p>i thought i got it right, but now i not sure ahha, i think i put choice E for that one… please help! thanks</p>
<p>It was R<P<0 I believe. 0<P<R wasn’t a choice</p>
<p>p<r<0 i believe @bKramer04</p>
<p>1 wrong and 1 blank on math.
1-3 wrong on CR
1-4 wrong on W with a ~10 for essay, </p>
<p>Can I still get an 2300?</p>
<p>@MyRealName well then stop acting ■■■■■■■ smart and just tell if the section with the soup stone passage was a experimental section or not</p>
<p>@ThemasterOG It was not an experimental section. </p>
<p>yeah @Hawkace you probably got
Math ~760
CR~790
W~ 740
I think ^</p>