<p>Score prediction as well for me please?</p>
<p>CR - missed 5-7
Math - missed 0-2
Writing - (irrelevant, going for superscore)</p>
<p>■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.com/sat-score-calculator/</p>
<p>@Asiannoob123</p>
<p>CR: 710-730
Math: 720-760
Writing: 760-770</p>
<p>Total: 2190-2260</p>
<p>@Clarinets
CR: 710-740
M: 760-800
W:------------</p>
<p>Superscore (out of 1600): 1470-1540</p>
<p>Do you really think 710-730 for reading? I took the December SAT, missed 7, and got a 680 on reading…I was frustrated because I could have gotten 700 had I not decided to second guess myself on a vocab question.</p>
<p>@Clarinets It’s definitely in your reach. Considering the difficulty of the CR, I wouldn’t label it as impossible. </p>
<p>Ok, well thank you. How did you do yourself?</p>
<p>Totally- absolutely random question-
But when is the latest you can take the sat and still apply early to ivies? </p>
<p>Also another question on the math…
The question about how many angles must be less than 90 if the 4 lines intersect… Etc. I checked on the google doc and it said 4 but I’m pretty sure it’s 3… Any explanations for that one? </p>
<p>So if I had an ACT section in my test it was experimental for sure right? </p>
<p>@ThePariah yes and @Asiannoob123 the vertical angle is equal (120) degrees that leaves the other 4 angles to be less than 90 each… how can it be 3 if u have any of the other ones more than 90 it adds up 120+90=210 or greater and that’s not possible for straight lines as the 120 degrees was lying on a straight line which we know the angle is 180 total…</p>
<p>But there are 5 angles since in total you have 6 angles
So the 5 angles should add up to 240 total since the one angle is 120. Therefore, since it was a must be answer… You need at most 3 less than 90 for 3 greater is 270 degrees which wouldn’t work </p>
<p>it was obviously 4. Your not understanding the question</p>
<p>One angle is 120 degrees, this is given. Since it has a vertical angle, this angle also has to be 120. This leaves us with 120 degrees and 4 other angles. If one of those angles was 90 degrees, its corresponding vertical angle would also have to be 90 degrees. But since we have only 120 degrees left to use, 2 more 90 degree angles aren’t possible. The answer is 4.</p>
<p>What was the one with the perpendicular line at point P? I’m pretty sure it had to have been 55? </p>
<p>It sucks that I had to omit ALOT more than I did in January 
This was simply harder… except for writing, I killed it</p>
<p>I agree, the writing was pretty basic. Math seemed average as well. As for critical reading… I felt like I was living a nightmare.</p>
<p>Yeah writing was easy, especially that payphones question… obviously without “had”</p>
<p>^ #homie</p>
<p>I thought math had a lot of questions with tricks (not hard, but hard to notice the small details), writing was usual, reading was a bit above normal </p>
<p>Anyone have definite answers to these?
Writing
Payphones: had revolutionized vs. revolutionized
Filtered from … (is it incorrect idiom or is it fine)</p>
<p>Prince:
Which question would’ve undermined the author’s arguments?
Which would’ve supported the authors arguments? (deeds, documents of workers’ pay)
What did the last paragraph do? (continue explanation, deepening mystery, disparity)
What characterizes the lines … (informed speculation or rudimentary hypothesis)</p>
<p>Can we stop with the whole payphones thing? We’re not going to come to a consensus on it.</p>