<p>did people get that the last paragraph was to show a disparity and the author felt at the end that it was a deepening mystery? </p>
<p>Did anyone get the experimental writing section on caffeine? It was 18 questions, 25 minutes, and was a full article broken into paragraphs. in each paragraph, sentences had numbers at the end of them corresponding to questions. it was easy though and had like 10 minutes of extra time</p>
<p>I still can’t figure out what my experimental was, I know it was section 7 in math i believe, but I’m not so sure I remember any questions. (Was the 2 circles finding the ratio of size experimental?)
I’m hoping for
700+ Writing
630+ Math
600+ CR </p>
<p>January I had (Only 10 days study)
630 Math
580 CR
590 Math </p>
<p>Any tips to bring me to a safe 2000-2100+ ?</p>
<p>@jdtennis4 yes that’s what I got
I hope section 6 math was exp…</p>
<p>anyone get hellen keller passage?</p>
<p>Did anyone have a passage about the transition from hunting to farming and it was writing section. It was about Southeast Asia?</p>
<p>Did no one think the end of the paragraph was an uncertain ending (something like that)?</p>
<p>@Castigations, I didn’t know you could have two math scores for one test with no writing score 
@blakeballer for the one where someone researched about some colonial guy?</p>
<p>@blakeballer22 i said that it was the explanation or whatever… the bijah passage was the worst.</p>
<p>For the improving paragraphs (writing) section … (Passage about the space wars and technology advancement)There was a question about a sentence (to improve)to the effect of “The end of the war was historic. Eventually both sides came to work on projects together” … (Something like that</p>
<p>Was the answer
“The end of war was historic AND …(the rest of the sentence)”
Or was it
The end of the war was historic ; (rest of sentence)</p>
<p>Additionally , If i only got this writing question wrong could I still get a 800? Please elaborate . Thanks</p>
<p>I’M REALLY MAD AT THE SLAVE PASSAGE. I DID FAIRLY WELL ON CR BUT THAT WAS MY SECTION 2 WHICH BASICALLY RUINED THAT PART FOR ME…</p>
<p>@Platinumxx2 - I put "The end of the war was historic AND …. " </p>
<p>@meliorus no Helen Keller passage on mine
@ParasPatel Didn’t have that</p>
<p>and yeah, the Bijah was terrible…there were a lot of questions where two answers made sense</p>
<p>@blakeballer22
Thanks for the response! I put that as well . If it’s correct and assuming I didn’t freakishly get any others wrong , i May have gotten a 800. Te only other writing questions I wasn’t sure about were the “salmon” one (which i selected salmon is as the error- it should have been are) and the : their one in grammar . It seems as though based on responses on here that I got those correct . We’ll see . Good luck to all!</p>
<p>For the essay. I finished my essay but I was going to write another sentence for my conclusion but I didn’t have time. Also I left about 5-6 lines blank on the 2nd page, will that make me get less than a 9? </p>
<p>Critical reading was a bloodbath, to say the very least…
Absolutely HATED Bijah.</p>
<p>I had an extra reading section, and I’m guessing that the one about pre-WWII White-Japanese romance is the experimental section. (It asked us to find the strongest support for the answer for the previous question, which was strange.)</p>
<p>My December scores were 710 CR / 740 M / 790 WR (80+8), but I’m not even sure if I got into the 700s on reading this time…</p>
<p>But overall, I think the math and writing sections were very doable. I suspect that the curves would be normal-ish.</p>
<p>Did anyone have 2 math sections with grid ins? Was the second one with a question with a circle and two triangle, one with side lengths 9 and 15, an experimental??? </p>
<p>@LeCookieMonster No it wasn’t experimental. </p>
<p>I put down grassland, whose for the last writing question because “their” is ambigious- can refer to officials or goats</p>
<p>@LeCookieMonster
I don’t think that perimeter question was experimental, although I may be wrong, since I had it as a multiple choice question.</p>
<p>The trick was to identify that both triangles had similar Pythagorean proportions (3:4:5); the shortest side for the bigger triangle was 15 (which corresponds to the 3), so naturally the other two sides turn out to be 20 and 25. The answer was 60.</p>