<p>I have heard that a masters degree is usually not worth much compared to a doctorate, unless it is in something like buisiness or engineering. Is this true? If it is, would getting a masters alongside a proffessional degree be more worthwhile compared to just a masters?</p>
<p>Um, no, that’s not remotely close to true.</p>
<p>What is your career goal, and how does graduate school relate to your ability to reach that goal? That’s the question you have to ask yourself.</p>
<p>My career goal is a forensic pathologist, which requires a medical degree, but I am also interested in forensic anthropology, which requires a degree in athropology, usually a doctorate. Normally a masters in anthropology doesn’t count for much. I was wondering if it would be better recieved if I had it alongside the medical degree.
And as for masters being less than worthwhile:
[What</a> Is a Master’s Degree Worth? - NYTimes.com](<a href=“http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/what-is-a-masters-degree-worth/]What”>What Is a Master's Degree Worth? - The New York Times)
There are other sites, but this seems the most credible, as well as it actually mentions anthropology.</p>
<p>If your future career plans are best served by pursuing a master’s degree, pursue one.</p>
<p>If your future career plans are not best served by pursuing a master’s degree, don’t pursue one.</p>
<p>That calculation is different for each and every person, depending on their particular goals, values and strengths. I’m mystified as to how you think any blanket generalization can possibly apply here.</p>
<p>As for master’s vs. doctorate, getting a Ph.D is massive overkill and a huge opportunity cost for someone who doesn’t intend to pursue a career in academia or advanced research. MS programs are commonly two years (or less) whereas it can take five to seven years to complete a Ph.D.</p>