<p>I'm going to take my first barrons practice tests today, but took a princeton review test ( I dont know if its harder lol) and got a 720 ( But I'm aiming for a 770-800)( I actually pretty much need to score that high)</p>
<p>What makes it worse is that I actually also ran out of time and took me an hour and 15-20 minutes to finish the entire test. </p>
<p>How did everyone find princeton review Math 2 compared to the real thing? ( I think I'm in deep **** right now)</p>
<p>My Princeton Review scores were lower than my real score, but only by a few points. As I was taking practice tests, I got 710 and 730 from PR, and 700s-740 on McGrawHill and a 740 on the real exam. Not to be pessimistic, but I think a 770 to 800 is unlikely for you at this point. You could probably still manage a 750, but you need to keep practicing. Take all the tests available to you, review answers carefully, and do not give yourself extra time.</p>
<p>I took a Barrons test yesterday and got a 600-610. I guess all I can do now is hope for the best lol.</p>
<p>My experience with Princeton is that their practice test results are surprisingly accurate – within 100 points one way or the other of the actual test (CR+M+W combined). And this has held true on multiple occasions over the past two years. In other words, any improvement reflected on the PR tests will similarly be reflected in an equivalent score on the actual test.</p>
<p>^ I’m not talking about the subject test not the reasoning test lol.</p>