<p>for math 3C, does anyone recommend one of the two professors: weisbart, caputo?
Which one's better?</p>
<p>I took Weisbart 1st quarter, and let me tell you, he's absolutely horrible. He has no sense of organization, and he constantly gets confused in class (and the students have to point out the obvious answers for him). He gets more caught up talking about gambling and Russian Roulette than anything else. </p>
<p>However, because he knows himself that he can't explain the material, he makes the test extremely extremely easy. This is first quarter though--might learn from his mistakes? or maybe not.</p>
<p>one of the guys on my floor had weisbart for 3c (last year?) and said that it was an okay class... he said he liked how if they got a better grade on the final than one the midterms than their overall grade was the final grade. he said he had a C all quarter but got a B on the final so he got a B in the class. however, he isn't the brightest of the bunch since he's repeating a couple classes (he's a sophomore and he started over with the chem 14 series this year because he failed last year). this might mean that weisbart is okay... but it's subjective</p>