<p>I was wondering what scores you all got on the Barron's Math II practice tests, and then what you got on the actual Math II SAT subject test. I just took the Barron's test and got a 650, so I'm wondering what my actual score will be.</p>
<p>Low-to-mid 700’s on Barron’s–>Piece of cake 800 on the real exam</p>
<p>^ not 100% buddy. the real test is very comparable to the difficulty of barron’s</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Are you out of your mind?</p>
<p>The level of the SAT math and physics books put out by Barron’s is significantly tougher, by design, than actual exams, IMO.</p>
<p>Practice Test #1: 800
Practice Test #2: 780 </p>
<p>I personally don’t find the Barron’s tests to be too difficult. If Barron’s is really a lot harder than the actual Math II then the actual must be pretty easy…</p>
<p>Take your Barron’s score and add around 50-70 points.</p>
<p>^Probably a good rule of thumb. But yeah, the difficulty between Barrons and the real thing is radically different. I never came close to 700 on Barrons, but got a 740 on the real thing.</p>
<p>good to know. I have Barrons for SAT Physics and the questions are absolutely brutal. Pulled a 670 on the pretest and the chapter quizzes are ridiculous</p>
<p>I got a 570 on a Barron’s test but a 690 on a Collegeboard one. So yeah, I’d say Barron’s is much harder.</p>
<p>i need a 800 in physics! what would you suggest?</p>
<p>the Barrons SAT Physics doesnt feel like you’re studying for a CollegeBoard test. It feelslike I’m studying for the physics tests at school. How similar are the questions to the real exam?</p>
<p>^^ Barron’s Math IIC is notorious for being much harder than the regular exam, probably to better prepare its users.</p>