<p>I'm seeing this but it just seems to good to be true? On current subject tests is it still that generous?</p>
<p>You actually need a raw score of 43/50 for 800, but that’s about as low as it gets. Some dates it’s harsher, and it’s easier to make errors on the test than you think.</p>
<p>BB test was really easy. Might be because I have been using barrons up until now. Missed 3; 2 stupid mistakes and 1 on matrices I skipped because never learned that. I am just surprised I have that I could got 2 more wrong and still wind up with a 800. Provided that test is about on par, which it should be, I’m set.</p>
<p>I thought the real test was a little bit harder than the BB test, but if you only got three wrong on the BB test I think your chances for an 800 are very good. Make sure you review matrices, though, because there’s a good chance you’ll see them on the test.</p>
<p>You’re on the right track. GL</p>
<p>by review you mean “learn”. idk if its worth the effort for one question. I can do detramants(sp) etc on ti-89 so its really only the conceptual questions. will If I have time though</p>
<p>Usually the curve is -6 = 800, use this to your advantage</p>
<p>At least understand the basic rules for adding and multiplying matrices. There may only be one or two questions on the test about matrices, but sometimes that can be the difference between getting and not getting an 800.</p>
<p>yeah, I’m over thinking this test. </p>
<p>Do they do a better job with “trick answers” then the SAT? on sat 1 math if you got the wrong answer it was almost never one of the choices, but I hear the satII is better at listing common mistakes as a choice.</p>
<p>I struggled much more with trick answers on the SAT I than on the SAT II.</p>
<p>huh?
I thought raw score (4 wrong or 5 blank) was 800.
But I guess its different every year</p>
<p>^ Usually it’s -6, sometimes -7.</p>