<p>Thats what I got, GPAx213</p>
<p>@ flyingpopat: Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I'm so mad that I missed it! Anyway, thanks. :)</p>
<p>maybe for you, though im not sure how that is possible</p>
<p>yes, the answer was 7.</p>
<p>I put the answer that was like (y-x)/(xy) > 0</p>
<p>yeah it was 7</p>
<p>but guys for the one for y=mx+b</p>
<p>finding out b: was it 8/3 or 8/7 ???????????????</p>
<p>It's 8/3. I am really sure on this one haha.</p>
<p>i got 8/3 when i solved it twice on my ti89 (<3 f2 solve).</p>
<p>it was a simple matter of treating it as a system of equations.</p>
<p>ok thanks...thats what i got!</p>
<p>I bubbled in -8/3</p>
<p>and idk what u guys are talking about but</p>
<p>i got y=2x not 3x=2y</p>
<p>it came out to y-2x+y=x when u substitute in the z which simplifies to 3x=2y</p>
<p>im pretty sure it is 7 balloon combo. </p>
<p>
[quote]
the parabola question was definitely II and III. Since the parabola was y = x^2 and it was bounded by y=4 at the top, the x values ranged from 2 to -2 thereby making the absolute value of x < 2. The other one said y > x^2, which is also true since the point (1,3) (just an example) was in the shaded region.
[/quote]
agreed.</p>
<p>Anybody get that (abc)^2 = 20? It was 5 but not sure if it was experimental of not.</p>
<p>What about question 20 on that same secon? side of a square is 3 and a circle at the vertex, how many additional times can it cross?</p>
<p>^Bigweight: that is fallacious.</p>
<p>
[quote]
and idk what u guys are talking about but</p>
<p>i got y=2x not 3x=2y
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I agree. Solved it literally the last second of the section.</p>
<p>^ I got y = 3x....lol, but that's not even in the debate...so nevermind. Ugh, I guess I got b/w a 700 and 750 for math...</p>
<p>no... it really is 3x=2y</p>
<p>I'm almost certain about 3x=2y. I solved it twice.</p>
<p>I believe the question was z = y-2x and z= x-y. simple substitution shows that the answer was 3x = 2y</p>
<p>I also put 3x = 2y. That one took some time.</p>